Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(134,490 posts)
Thu Feb 26, 2026, 07:59 PM 5 hrs ago

What Pete Hegseth's fixation on Mark Kelly reveals

The Defense secretary is appealing a judge’s order blocking him from censuring Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., for participating in a video with five other Democratic lawmakers reminding service members of their duty to disobey illegal orders.

Hegseth’s determination to continue fighting Kelly in court shows how fixated he is on suppressing free speech and punishing dissent against the Pentagon. His doggedness also illustrates the Trump administration’s determination to reconceptualize the military as a politicized fighting force that shouldn’t be bound by the law.

Hegseth seems to face a steep hill in his bid to punish Kelly.

In November, six Democratic lawmakers who served either in the military or in the intelligence community released a video in which they said at various points that service members “can” or “must” disobey illegal orders and reminded them that they “swear an oath to protect and defend this Constitution.” Even though it’s true that service members swear to protect the Constitution and are only required to follow lawful orders, and even though their remarks are constitutionally protected free speech, the Trump administration responded hysterically. President Donald Trump absurdly declared the video an act of “sedition” that should be “punishable by death.”

-snip-

As Lt. Col. Rachel E. VanLandingham, who’s retired from the Air Force, wrote for MS NOW, Hegseth’s position is that he can treat military retirees the same as active service members — who do face more stringent restrictions on their speech while serving in the military, in part to ensure the military’s need for obedience to commands. But VanLandingham, who is a law professor at Southwestern Law School, Los Angeles, said “no court has ever extended this shrunken First Amendment protection to military retirees.” She added, “I trust that the D.C. Circuit, and eventually the Supreme Court, will continue to protect the free speech rights of millions of us military retirees.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/pete-hegseth-fixation-mark-kelly-110000418.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Pete Hegseth's fixation on Mark Kelly reveals (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 5 hrs ago OP
ED? Performance anxiety? On another bender? marble falls 5 hrs ago #1
Maybe Pete has a small peter too? chicoescuela 4 hrs ago #4
Purity of essence progressoid 4 hrs ago #5
Maybe jealousy? vapor2 5 hrs ago #2
Mostly jealousy odins folly 5 hrs ago #3
DUI hire needs to assert his self-importance. Norrrm 3 hrs ago #6

odins folly

(576 posts)
3. Mostly jealousy
Thu Feb 26, 2026, 08:43 PM
5 hrs ago

Kegstand was a major in the reserves, it’s been said he joined in cas he went into politics…. Fuck him

Major is an O4, Kelly an O6 and had a distinguished career in the Navy and with NASA, unlike the dunktank drunk weekend warrior…..

Jealousy…..

Norrrm

(4,630 posts)
6. DUI hire needs to assert his self-importance.
Thu Feb 26, 2026, 10:37 PM
3 hrs ago

Generals, admirals, and other high-ranking officers must feel let down to toe the line to this drunken minor major.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»What Pete Hegseth's fixat...