Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dulcinea

(10,164 posts)
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 08:28 AM 7 hrs ago

Trump leans in on a major 2026 issue: possibly replacing Justices Alito and Thomas

(CNN) President Donald Trump seems to be leaning in on the idea that elderly conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas might think about a conveniently timed retirement this year.

Trump couched his comments to Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo in respect for the jurisprudence and decision-making processes of both justices. But he also repeatedly gestured at the political utility of them retiring soon:

“I think he is one of the great justices of all time,” Trump said of Alito, before adding: “It’d be nice to say, now I have somebody for 40 years.”

https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/16/politics/supreme-court-trump-alito-thomas

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump leans in on a major 2026 issue: possibly replacing Justices Alito and Thomas (Original Post) Dulcinea 7 hrs ago OP
Do they need 60 votes in the Senate to confirm? Bluestocking 7 hrs ago #1
No JBTaurus83 7 hrs ago #2
51. If either Justice died after January 2026, no_hypocrisy 7 hrs ago #5
Epstein. marble falls 7 hrs ago #3
Democratic Senate Candidates displacedvermoter 7 hrs ago #4
It won't matter if he replaces them with Cannon and Barron Fiendish Thingy 7 hrs ago #6
A worse person than those two pwb 6 hrs ago #7
That was my reaction after seeing the headline Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 3 hrs ago #10
They found Kavanaugh. eggplant 3 hrs ago #11
he doesn't need worse, just younger Oliver Bolliver Butt 2 hrs ago #15
If ever there was a reason to change how SCOTUS is organized... TheWaywardTarheel 5 hrs ago #8
Ideal outcome... homegirl 4 hrs ago #9
I'd really like to share that article, but it's behind a paywall. Sogo 3 hrs ago #12
We need a super majority! BidenRocks 3 hrs ago #13
He just wants to say he appointed to new justices jgmiller 3 hrs ago #14
"Piggy couched his comments MorbidButterflyTat 1 hr ago #16
I SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO look forward to having somebody else sounding off calimary 1 hr ago #17
He may continue to sound off for a while, but I don't think he'll be able to do it for long. ShazzieB 52 min ago #19
No, jackhole, YOU won't "have somebody for 40 years." ShazzieB 1 hr ago #18

no_hypocrisy

(55,054 posts)
5. 51. If either Justice died after January 2026,
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 09:00 AM
7 hrs ago

Trump would be extremely frustrated. We could have 8 justices until 2029.

displacedvermoter

(4,699 posts)
4. Democratic Senate Candidates
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 08:59 AM
7 hrs ago

must make Supreme Court reform, including raising number of justices to match number of federal districts, a primary talking point. If there is going to be that Blue Tsunami I keep hearing about, then it needs to really mean something.

Keeping the status quo on the Supreme Court means another quarter century and more of right wing oppression judicially enforced.

Fiendish Thingy

(23,440 posts)
6. It won't matter if he replaces them with Cannon and Barron
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 09:10 AM
7 hrs ago

As long as voters elect Dems willing to expand the court, and kill the filibuster to do so.

Without expanding the court and neutralizing the MAGA majority, there can be no repairing of the damage of the Trump era, no restoration of lost rights.

eggplant

(4,213 posts)
11. They found Kavanaugh.
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 12:55 PM
3 hrs ago

There are worse people further down in the barrel. Like Hegseth, Cannon, ...

8. If ever there was a reason to change how SCOTUS is organized...
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 11:03 AM
5 hrs ago

....it would be the prospect of one or two more youngish, Trump-aligned jurists serving on the High Court for 3+ decades.

That alone should motivate people to demand accountability from the Court in some way, shape or more. Am I wrong to think that?

homegirl

(1,971 posts)
9. Ideal outcome...
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 11:27 AM
4 hrs ago

House and Senate go Democratic majority. Alito and Thomas retire, Democratic House and Senate refuse to consider replacements until 2029!

BidenRocks

(3,344 posts)
13. We need a super majority!
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 12:57 PM
3 hrs ago

Then we can expand the courts to side step chumps stacking and restore honor and equality!

jgmiller

(696 posts)
14. He just wants to say he appointed to new justices
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 12:58 PM
3 hrs ago

If they do retire whoever he puts there will be just as bad as the two of them. He does not care that the replacements will serve for 30 years he just wants to be able to say he got to more, it's him keeping score.

MorbidButterflyTat

(4,617 posts)
16. "Piggy couched his comments
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 02:44 PM
1 hr ago

to Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo in respect for the jurisprudence and decision-making processes of both justices. "

That is some heavy duty sane washing right there!

calimary

(90,302 posts)
17. I SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO look forward to having somebody else sounding off
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 02:56 PM
1 hr ago

OTHER THAN trump.

Unfortunately, if he lives long enough to complain that America (hopefully) voted for a Democrat in 2028, he’ll STILL find every possible microphone. Like a bloodhound sniffing for bloodstains.

ShazzieB

(22,695 posts)
19. He may continue to sound off for a while, but I don't think he'll be able to do it for long.
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 03:22 PM
52 min ago

His cognitive decline is proceeding apace, and pretty soon, he'll be nonverbal, assuming he lives long enough to even finish this term.

At least that's what I keep telling myself, because I desperately want to live long enough to experience a Schlump free world again, if only for a short time.

ShazzieB

(22,695 posts)
18. No, jackhole, YOU won't "have somebody for 40 years."
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 03:12 PM
1 hr ago

YOU won't have anything, because you will soon be in a nursing home (or possibly being cared for by private nurses at home, although I'm skeptical about your spawn being willing to part with enough of their future inheritance to pay for that), and in a hole in the ground not long after. WE are the ones who will be stuck with any sociopath(s) you might decide to replace Alito and/or Thomas with.

What a scary prospect! On the one hand, it's hard to imagine anyone worse than T and A, but if there is such a person, Schlump will find them, and they'll occupy those seats for a very long time into the future.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Trump leans in on a major...