Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
SCOTUS's immigration decisions prove cruelty is still the point
SCOTUSs immigration decisions prove cruelty is still the point
The Supreme Court's latest rulings signal that compassionate conservatism is officially dead
By Chauncey DeVega
Senior Writer
Published June 28, 2026 6:30AM (EDT)
(Salon) In accepting the Republican nomination for president in 2000, George W. Bush advocated for a political ideology he called compassionate conservatism. Reflecting on his message 18 years later, he said, I felt compelled to phrase it this way because people hear conservative and they think heartless. And my belief then and now is that the right conservative philosophies are compassionate and help people. Compassionate means you care about people and the policies you enunciate help people . . . Its a simple political principle that good policy makes good politics, but good politics comes out of policies that affect people in a positive way.
Twenty-six years after his election as president, Bushs compassionate conservatism is dead at the hands of Donald Trump. The president and his MAGA Republicans didnt just bury the political corpse, they dug it up out of the ground and killed it repeatedly.
....(snip)....
Mullin v. Doe is the worst of this trio of immigration rulings, ending Temporary Protected Status for an estimated 330,000 Haitians, 6,000 Syrians and potentially more than one million other immigrants who are in the United States under the auspices of that program. Created in 1990, T.P.S. protects immigrants who are unable to return to their home countries because of violence, natural disasters or other great danger.
....(snip)....
In politics, there are many ways to hurt or help hundreds of thousands, and potentially millions, of people. On Thursday, the unelected and unaccountable conservative Supreme Court majority chose to do so with brutality, dressed up in cold judicial language.
In her dissent, Sotomayor warned, The consequences of todays decision are predictable. More people will die. More people will attempt to cross the border illegally, and some will make it while others will not. ................(more)
https://www.salon.com/2026/06/28/scotuss-immigration-decisions-prove-cruelty-is-still-the-point/
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS's immigration decisions prove cruelty is still the point (Original Post)
marmar
18 hrs ago
OP
littlemissmartypants
(35,498 posts)1. More...
This is not an exercise in abstract legal theory. Doctors who provide life-saving care in their communities will be forced to leave the country. Scientists will have to stop their research. Parents will be taken away from their children who were born in the United States. Businesses will be forced to close. Thriving communities will be hollowed out. Many will be sent back to war zones and countries devastated by natural disasters. People fleeing persecution because of their political beliefs, gender or sexuality, and how they pray will face certain peril.
More families are going to be destroyed, and more people will die. The fabric that is the United States of America is being shredded.
JT45242
(4,241 posts)2. Compassionate conservatism was a lie they told to assuage guilt
There is no such thing as compassionate conservatism. I know a rube who worked IY for congress who believes this bullshit.
She praised.pemcevwhen he was a senator for voting against the darm bill because foid stamps. Tfats not compassion that is evil.