As important as any story out there from Det. Free press. The Michigan dictatorship voted out.
LANSING Michigan voters have rejected the states toughened emergency manager law, Public Act 4 of 2011.
With 93% of precincts reporting, 52% of state voters said no to keeping the controversial law, while 48% said yes.
The outcome is a blow to Gov. Rick Snyder, who was successful in opposing five proposed constitutional amendments Tuesday, including one that would have required a statewide vote on the proposed public bridge to Canada that he champions.
It also puts in doubt the status of emergency financial managers in Michigan cities and school districts who have been operating under the former law, Public Act 72 of 1990, since Public Act 4 was suspended in August.
And the repeal clouds the issue of the financial stability agreement between the state and the financially troubled city of Detroit, which was approved pursuant to the law.
The group Stand up for Democracy, which pushed for the repeal of the emergency manager law, takes the position that the 1990 law has already been repealed and there is no emergency manager law today.
Snyder argues otherwise, though there has also been discussion of passing a replacement law during the pending lame duck session of the Legislature.
Full article here: http://laborspains.blogspot.com/2012/11/michigans-toughened-emergency-manager.html
originally posted here: http://www.freep.com/article/20121107/NEWS15/121107008
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)Does that mean some towns get their government and assets back?
SharonAnn
(13,777 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)catbyte
(34,415 posts)didn't twist the proposal's wording to read yes means no & no means yes. I am bummed about 2 & 3 failing. Prop 3 opponents, Big Oil & Coal, called themselves the Citizen's Coalition for Clean Renewable Energy Futures or a similar lie. Wicked.
snpsmom
(684 posts)not a constitutional amendment. I am sorry about 2, though.
Cha
(297,446 posts)malthaussen
(17,209 posts)... that is the only way I can figure it: a number of people do not have the properly skeptical, paranoid attitude towards government statements.
-- Mal
Squinch
(50,986 posts)geefloyd46
(1,939 posts)I actually went looking for the results and maybe DU writers are waiting for the dust to clear to see what this means.
Squinch
(50,986 posts)and died. And I'm from New York!
That whole deal really was Orwellian and scary. I'm so glad it's been voted out. I'm interested to see how it shakes out.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)They cannot both be law at the same time, and you cannot just pop the old law off the stack when the new one is thrown out.
geefloyd46
(1,939 posts)I hear ruling will come after Thanksgiving.
lindysalsagal
(20,714 posts)The elected officials will have to solve their own problems.