Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

geefloyd46

(1,939 posts)
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:16 PM Nov 2012

As important as any story out there from Det. Free press. The Michigan dictatorship voted out.

LANSING — Michigan voters have rejected the state’s toughened emergency manager law, Public Act 4 of 2011.

With 93% of precincts reporting, 52% of state voters said no to keeping the controversial law, while 48% said yes.

The outcome is a blow to Gov. Rick Snyder, who was successful in opposing five proposed constitutional amendments Tuesday, including one that would have required a statewide vote on the proposed public bridge to Canada that he champions.

It also puts in doubt the status of emergency financial managers in Michigan cities and school districts who have been operating under the former law, Public Act 72 of 1990, since Public Act 4 was suspended in August.

And the repeal clouds the issue of the financial stability agreement between the state and the financially troubled city of Detroit, which was approved pursuant to the law.

The group Stand up for Democracy, which pushed for the repeal of the emergency manager law, takes the position that the 1990 law has already been repealed and there is no emergency manager law today.

Snyder argues otherwise, though there has also been discussion of passing a replacement law during the pending lame duck session of the Legislature.

Full article here: http://laborspains.blogspot.com/2012/11/michigans-toughened-emergency-manager.html

originally posted here: http://www.freep.com/article/20121107/NEWS15/121107008

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
1. I can't imagine why anyone would vote yes.
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:24 PM
Nov 2012

Does that mean some towns get their government and assets back?

catbyte

(34,415 posts)
4. MI voters defeated every ballot proposal. I was surprised Snyder & his minions
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 10:52 PM
Nov 2012

didn't twist the proposal's wording to read yes means no & no means yes. I am bummed about 2 & 3 failing. Prop 3 opponents, Big Oil & Coal, called themselves the Citizen's Coalition for Clean Renewable Energy Futures or a similar lie. Wicked.

malthaussen

(17,209 posts)
7. 52-48? Ya know, there's a lot of trusting people out there...
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 08:51 AM
Nov 2012

... that is the only way I can figure it: a number of people do not have the properly skeptical, paranoid attitude towards government statements.

-- Mal

geefloyd46

(1,939 posts)
9. I agree.
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 09:28 AM
Nov 2012

I actually went looking for the results and maybe DU writers are waiting for the dust to clear to see what this means.

Squinch

(50,986 posts)
10. I was all excited and posted a short blurb on the result when the numbers came out, and it sank
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 09:32 AM
Nov 2012

and died. And I'm from New York!

That whole deal really was Orwellian and scary. I'm so glad it's been voted out. I'm interested to see how it shakes out.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
11. The old law was repealed when the new one went into effect.
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 10:21 AM
Nov 2012

They cannot both be law at the same time, and you cannot just pop the old law off the stack when the new one is thrown out.

lindysalsagal

(20,714 posts)
12. Very important victory. Real human votes make legaleze irrelevant.
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 10:30 AM
Nov 2012

The elected officials will have to solve their own problems.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»As important as any story...