Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 01:16 PM Dec 2012

Kassandra Perkins did not have to die.

This from Jessica Valenti in The Nation:


A good person. Genuine. Pleasant. Nice. Hard-working. A family man. The media has used all of these terms to describe Jovan Belcher after he murdered Kasandra Perkins, shooting her nine times. In fact, these glowing descriptors are all from just one article in The New York Times. But don’t worry, there are plenty of pieces sharing lovely sentiments about the man who killed his girlfriend, the mother of his barely 3-month old daughter.

While mainstream media and supporters of Belcher have no problem spouting off flattery, most are hesitant to call what happened domestic violence. They’ve gone out of their way to suggest that Belcher murdered Perkins—who friends called ‘Kasi’—because of sustained head injuries or because of alcohol or drug abuse. A police officer, Sgt. Richard Sharp, has even suggested that Belcher committed suicide after killing Kasi because “he cared about her.”

“I don’t think he could live with himself,” he said. What a romantic.

It’s horribly offensive to laud a man who murdered his girlfriend and left his daughter parentless. It’s also irresponsible. When the media reports domestic violence murders as random tragedies—or when individuals say the perpetrator must have “snapped”—they enable a culture of violence against women. Because when you don’t contextualize this violence as part of structural misogyny, you give credence to the myth that there was nothing anyone could have done to stop it.



more:

http://www.thenation.com/blog/171607/kasandra-perkins-did-not-have-die#

He was NOT a nice guy; he had a long history of violent behavior against women. But no one ever did anything about it. No one ever does. The biggest threat to women is their partners, especially when those partners are violent and when they attempt to leave them.

And "couples counseling"? Really? As Valenti says, that is the worst way to deal with domestic violence issues. She should have been encouraged to leave him and get a restraining order, though that is difficult enough for regular people, not to mention star football players.

Look, he was NOT a decent guy and I'm glad he's not around to hurt another woman. But I am very sorry he had to take her with him and leave his child an orphan. Can you imagine having to tell that kid what he did?

I am thoroughly disgusted by the coverage of this event so far. "He just snapped." or "We had no idea." Yes, you did, you just chose not to get involved, beyond some bullshit couple counseling.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kassandra Perkins did not have to die. (Original Post) alarimer Dec 2012 OP
All I can think of is that child left parentless... hlthe2b Dec 2012 #1
All I could think was - I'm glad the child didn't get killed in the bargain phantom power Dec 2012 #2
Yes.. that would be the only way to make this horror even worse. hlthe2b Dec 2012 #3
NRA Claims She Would Still Be Alive If She Had A Gun kaspar411 Dec 2012 #4

hlthe2b

(102,292 posts)
1. All I can think of is that child left parentless...
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 01:18 PM
Dec 2012

There are a lot of issues here, but all I can think about is that poor child. What a senseless waste...

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
2. All I could think was - I'm glad the child didn't get killed in the bargain
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 01:22 PM
Dec 2012

that's how low my standards have fallen

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Kassandra Perkins did not...