Inequality Is Holding Back the Recovery
Joseph Stiglitz
The re-election of President Obama was like a Rorschach test, subject to many interpretations. In this election, each side debated issues that deeply worry me: the long malaise into which the economy seems to be settling, and the growing divide between the 1 percent and the rest an inequality not only of outcomes but also of opportunity. To me, these problems are two sides of the same coin: with inequality at its highest level since before the Depression, a robust recovery will be difficult in the short term, and the American dream a good life in exchange for hard work is slowly dying.
Politicians typically talk about rising inequality and the sluggish recovery as separate phenomena, when they are in fact intertwined. Inequality stifles, restrains and holds back our growth. When even the free-market-oriented magazine The Economist argues as it did in a special feature in October that the magnitude and nature of the countrys inequality represent a serious threat to America, we should know that something has gone horribly wrong. And yet, after four decades of widening inequality and the greatest economic downturn since the Depression, we havent done anything about it.
A fifth of our kids live in poverty an aberration among rich nations.
There are four major reasons inequality is squelching our recovery. The most immediate is that our middle class is too weak to support the consumer spending that has historically driven our economic growth. While the top 1 percent of income earners took home 93 percent of the growth in incomes in 2010, the households in the middle who are most likely to spend their incomes rather than save them and who are, in a sense, the true job creators have lower household incomes, adjusted for inflation, than they did in 1996. The growth in the decade before the crisis was unsustainable it was reliant on the bottom 80 percent consuming about 110 percent of their income.
Second, the hollowing out of the middle class since the 1970s, a phenomenon interrupted only briefly in the 1990s, means that they are unable to invest in their future, by educating themselves and their children and by starting or improving businesses.
in full: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/19/inequality-is-holding-back-the-recovery/
PDJane
(10,103 posts)It becomes too top heavy to sustain itself.