Brennan’s Bumbling Case for Terror War
from Consortium News:
Brennans Bumbling Case for Terror War
February 9, 2013
Exclusive: CIA Director-designate John Brennan stumbled through less-than-challenging questions at his Senate confirmation hearing, struggling to square the circle of his past ties to abuses in the war on terror with his future promises to be a force for openness and reform, as ex-CIA analyst Melvin A. Goodman notes.
By Melvin A. Goodman
In the
New York Times, veteran intelligence writers Mark Mazzetti and Scott Shane described Thursdays confirmation hearing for John Brennan as notably aggressive and that it produced intense questioning for the next director of the Central Intelligence Agency. The Washington Posts Greg Miller, another intelligence veteran, said that there were heated exchanges as Brennan was challenged in often blunt terms
Nothing could be further from the truth as the feckless Senate Intelligence Committee and its chairman, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, led Brennan on a virtual walk in the park on the way to confirmation next week.
Keep in mind that Brennan could not be nominated for CIA director four years ago because of the intense opposition to his approval of the agencys policy of extraordinary renditions, which permitted the CIA to take people off the streets of Europe and the Middle East and transfer them to foreign intelligence services that routinely engaged in the most sadistic kinds of torture.
Also, keep in mind that Brennan is the architect of the U.S. policy of targeted killings that have made assassinations a routine part of U.S. foreign policy. And in a shocking statement that was never addressed by the committee, Brennan admitted that, after reading the summary of the committees secret report on torture and abuse, he could no longer maintain that torture actually saved American lives. ...................(more)
The complete piece is at:
http://consortiumnews.com/2013/02/09/brennans-bumbling-defense-of-terror-war/