Noam Chomsky: ‘No individual changes anything alone’
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/23/noam-chomsky-no-individual-changes-anything-alone/
It may have been pouring with rain, water overrunning the gutters and spreading fast and deep across Londons Euston Road, but this did not stop a queue forming, and growing until it snaked almost all the way back to Euston station. Inside Friends House, a Quaker-run meeting hall, the excitement was palpable. People searched for friends and seats with thinly disguised anxiety; all watched the stage until, about 15 minutes late, a short, slightly top-heavy old man climbed carefully on to the stage and sat down. The hall filled with cheers and clapping, with whoops and with whistles.
Noam Chomsky, said two speakers (one of them Mariam Said, whose late husband, Edward, this lecture honours) needs no introduction. A tired turn of phrase, but they had a point: in a bookshop down the road the politics section is divided into biography, reference, the Clintons, Obama, Thatcher, Marx, and Noam Chomsky. He topped the first Foreign Policy/Prospect Magazine list of global thinkers in 2005 (the most recent, however, perhaps reflecting a new editorship and a new rubric, lists him not at all). One study of the most frequently cited academic sources of all time found that he ranked eighth, just below Plato and Freud. The list included the Bible.
When he starts speaking, it is in a monotone that makes no particular rhetorical claim on the audiences attention; in fact, its almost soporific. Last October, he tells his audience, he visited Gaza for the first time. Within five minutes many of the hallmarks of Chomskys political writing, and speaking, are displayed: his anger, his extraordinary range of reference and experience journalism from inside Gaza, personal testimony, detailed knowledge of the old Egyptian government, its secret service, the new Egyptian government, the historical context of the Israeli occupation, recent news reports (of sewage used by the Egyptians to flood tunnels out of Gaza, and by Israelis to spray non-violent protesters). Fact upon fact upon fact, but also a withering, sweeping sarcasm the atrocities are tolerated politely by Europe as usual. Harsh, vivid phrases the hideously charred corpses of murdered infants; bodies writhing in agony unspool until they become almost a form of punctuation.
You could argue that the latter is necessary, simply a description of atrocities that must be reported, but it is also a method that has diminishing returns. The facts speak for themselves; the adjectives and the sarcasm have the counterintuitive effect of cheapening them, of imposing on the world a disappointingly crude and simplistic argument. The sentences, wrote Larissa MacFarquhar in a brilliant New Yorker profile of Chomsky 10 years ago, are accusations of guilt, but not from a position of innocence or hope for something better: Chomskys sarcasm is the scowl of a fallen world, the sneer of hells veteran to its appalled naifs and thus, in an odd way, static and ungenerative.