Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

choie

(4,111 posts)
Mon May 6, 2013, 01:42 AM May 2013

I guess this is why Obama chose Mary Jo White for the SEC

A Disappointing Debut

Mary Jo White, the new chairwoman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, has gotten off on the wrong foot. Last week, in her first commission vote, Ms. White led the commissioners in approving a proposal that, if finalized, could leave investors and taxpayers exposed to the ravages of reckless bank trading. Mary Jo White, the new chairwoman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, has gotten off on the wrong foot. Last week, in her first commission vote, Ms. White led the commissioners in approving a proposal that, if finalized, could leave investors and taxpayers exposed to the ravages of reckless bank trading.

At issue is the regulation of the multitrillion-dollar market in derivatives. When speculative derivative bets go right, the results are lavish bank profits and huge banker paydays. When they go wrong, the results are shareholder losses and taxpayer-provided bailouts. Even when derivatives are used in a relatively prudent manner — say, to hedge against price swings in food or fuel — the largely deregulated and opaque way they are traded allows the big banks that dominate the market to charge more than they could if trading were more transparent, enriching bankers at the expense of businesses and consumers.

The S.E.C. proposal would let the foreign branches of American banks avoid rules being developed under the Dodd-Frank financial reform law and instead follow rules that prevail in the foreign countries where the deals are done. Foreign banks involved in derivative deals with American companies also could adhere to their own country’s rules as long as those rules are deemed broadly comparable to Dodd-Frank rules.

More at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/06/opinion/a-disappointing-debut-at-the-sec.html?hp

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
3. If it's Monday it must be the first of many anti-Obama rah rah threads of the week
Mon May 6, 2013, 04:01 AM
May 2013

put down the democratic people on a democratic board.

life is so Rebecca Black like, isn't it?

yet the same crowd tells us to stay out of the world's business, Ron Paul style too.

damned if ya do, damned if ya don't to the Rebecca Black school of politics.

progressoid

(49,992 posts)
8. Great response. You really rebutted the points of the article well.
Mon May 6, 2013, 11:26 AM
May 2013

It's your ability to get the heart of the matter without resorting to inane comparisons that makes us revere your posts.



Or not.



 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
10. If it's Monday it must be the first Obama insult to the 99% for the week.
Mon May 6, 2013, 12:51 PM
May 2013

Why doesn't he at least toss us a crumb once a month or so? Declare that SS will not be cut while he's signing bills into law. Appoint an ass-kicking Deputy AG to clean up the banking industry? Announce that the KeystoneXL will not receive his approval? Follow up on his pledge to close Gitmo? Do something about the minimum wage? something, anything, to show that we is dears us as much as he does the Repukes?

When he switches parties, whose side are you going to be on?

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
11. I care more about minorities/women/Gays&Hispanics
Mon May 6, 2013, 01:17 PM
May 2013

I love Eric Holder, probably the best AG ever.

all the above are just the same old group regurgitating the same old soundbytes

we all have our wedge issues, but I don't whine myself if life isn't 100% perfect.

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
14. You care about these groups more than which other groups?
Mon May 6, 2013, 05:34 PM
May 2013

the poor, the elderly, the 99% ??

Are these your top four groups and everyone else can go pound sand?

What about puppies and orphans? Where do they rank on your get fucked over scale?

Cheers!

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
5. You all know where this is going, right?
Mon May 6, 2013, 04:26 AM
May 2013

We are headed for Mad Max World. If they keep this up, then I say we need a Jubilee every 7 years. Because the Safety Net will be gone, and taxes will be sky high for us lowly 99%ers. And you think THIS is a recession? Ha! Where we're at NOW is worse than the Great Depression, all things considered. You do the math. We're going' down folks. Every time we hear reports like this, mark it up to little catalysts that are leading to the fall of the American Empire.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
7. We already knew she was a bankster supporter
Mon May 6, 2013, 09:10 AM
May 2013

This just confirms it.

Frankly, People have been given zero choice in this matter. Both Repub and dem candidates for 08 and 12 were bankster supporters. The aggravating thing about Obama is how much of a blatant liar he was during his campaigns. But I guess we just have to remember that all politicians are liars.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
9. I don't see how it's possible to root for Elizabeth Warren AND
Mon May 6, 2013, 12:45 PM
May 2013

the president. Their goals seem to be completely at odds with each other.

Can someone please tell me in a paragraph or so what the hell is Obama trying to do to the country???

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
12. 80-20 and make irrelevant and obsolete the 20.It never was the way you thought
Mon May 6, 2013, 01:19 PM
May 2013

and Elizabeth Warren is 100% a team Obama player.
Who will be beaming the day Hillary is elected President.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»I guess this is why Obama...