The Republicans’ Lost Privacy
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2012/01/the-republicans-lost-privacy.html
The Republicans Lost Privacy
Posted by Jeffrey Toobin
Since Ronald Reagan, Republican Presidents (and Presidential nominees) have been committed to overturning Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Courts abortion-rights landmark from 1973. But
as the debates last weekend in New Hampshire suggested, the G.O.P. appears to have taken a more extreme step in terms of rolling back the Constitutional right to privacy.
Since the first time Mitt Romney ran for President, four years ago, hes been on record reversing his previous support for abortion rights. However, when pressed by George Stephanopoulos in the debate Saturday night, Romney went beyond mere opposition to Roe.
He said he thought Griswold v. Connecticut, the 1965 case that first made explicit the right to privacy, was also wrong. I dont believe they decided that correctly, Romney said. In this, the front-runner was eagerly seconded by Rick Santorum, who said the Justices created through a penumbra of rights a new right to privacy that was not in the Constitution.
snip//
And that is what makes Romney and Santorums criticism of Griswold so troubling. Over the years the modern Republican Party has reflected both libertarian and authoritarian tendencies. Both survive, in a way. When it comes to taxes and regulation, the libertarian side of the party is ascendant. Even the rhetoric of compassionate conservatism has faded from view. But
with regard to civil liberties, the G.O.P. has embraced state power with a vengeance. Whether its the rights of wartime detainees, or abortion rights, or the rights of gay people to marry (or to be free from discrimination), contemporary Republican leaders reflect clear moral disapproval. (Even Ron Paul, who is often described as a libertarian, is a fierce opponent of a womans right to choose abortion. And Rick Perry recently announced that hes against a right to abortion even in cases of rape or incest.) Privacy is often described as the right to be left alone, but thats not a value that seems terribly important in the G.O.P. right now.
The old cases of Pierce and Meyer show how important that right is. Though we may live in sex-obsessed times, these cases serve as useful reminders that an overbearing state can also assert itself in other ways.
Republicans, and conservatives of all kinds, should be especially attuned to the possibility of governmental overreach. As Romney and Santorum illustrated last weekend, theyre not.