The Logic of the Surveillance State
Liberalism, in its classic form, is, among other things, the proposition that you get more out of people if you treat them well. Conservatism is the proposition that you get more out of people if you treat them badly.
Post war Liberalism as a giant experiment in treat people well. The Reagan/Thatcher counter-revolution was a giant experiment in treat people worse. The empirical result is this: the rich are richer and more powerful in a society that treats people like shit, but a society which treats people well has a stronger economy, all other things being equal, than one that treats them badly. This was, also, the result of the USSR/West competition. (Treating people well or badly isnt just about equality.)
Liberalism, classic and modern, believes that a properly functioning freer society is a more powerful society, all other things being equal. This was, explicitly, Adam Smiths argument. Build a strong peacetime economy, and in wartime you will crush despotic nations into the dirt.
...
What is being run right now is a vast experiment to see if modern technology has fixed these problems with surveillance and opporessive states. Is it cheap enough to go full Stasi, and with that level of surveillance can you keep control over the economy, keep the levers working, make people do what you want, and not all slack off and resist passively, by only going through the motions?
The oligarchs are betting that the technology has made that change. With the end of serious war between primary nations (enforced by nukes, among other things), with the creation of a transnational ruling class, and with the ability to scale surveillance, it may be possible to take and keep control indefinitely, and bypass the well understood problems of oligarchy and police and surveillance states.
http://www.ianwelsh.net/the-logic-of-the-surveillance-state/
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
BillyRibs
(787 posts)Last edited Mon Jun 10, 2013, 06:32 AM - Edit history (1)
Liberalism, in its classic form, is, among other things, the proposition that you get more out of people if you treat them well. Conservatism is the proposition that you get more out of people if you treat them badly.-Ian Welsh
This is a great quote!
phantom power
(25,966 posts)PopeOxycontinI
(176 posts)one or two threads some months ago stating my fear that this time totalitarian control
will be for good, given all the surveillance technology and its very liberal use,
as well as the lack of competition between different forms of government.
The USA is becoming more authoritarian like China, while China becomes more
capitalistic like the US. Can anyone posit a plausible successful revolt scenario at
this point? Oh, by the way, FUCK THE NSA!
marmar
(77,083 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)... how enormous it is and how expensive it is to run in terms of electricity, water (to cool the server rooms) and of course the people (read: overpaid contractors) involved in all the snooping and analyzing.
Its going to use enough electricity to run 65,000 households, IIRC. F'in ridiculous.
And as someone said on Amy Goodman, the folks it's supposed to 'catch' already know they're probably being tracked and are using other methods of communication. So this isn't about monitoring/catching THEM.
I dislike living here more and more.