Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
PRISM Isn’t Data Mining and Other Falsehoods in the N.S.A. “Scandal”
-snip-
In other words, the NSA doesnt give a damn about you swapping recipes with your Aunt Edithor even your decision to email your drug dealer (foolish as that might be.) And the NSA doesnt get to establish the minimization procedures on its ownthose, too, have to be approved by the FISA courts.
In the past, some minimization procedures bordered on the absurd: for example, pre9/11, the rules said that the name of companies based in the United States could not be used in communications transmitted from the N.S.A. to other intelligence or law-enforcement bodies. So, suppose the N.S.A. learned through signals intel that a known terrorist was flying at noon on June 20 from Frankfurt to New York on Delta flight no. 2012. Any communication could identify the terrorist, locations, date, and time; however, the C.I.A. and F.B.I. couldnt be told they were flying in on Delta. Based in Atlanta, you see.
As for the purported secrecy of this programfolks havent been listening. Section 702 was widely debated and parsed through by the Congress before its adoption in 2008 (under the Bush administration). It was widely debated and parsed through by Congress before its re-authorization in December 2012 (under the Obama administration). Any supposed expert who feigns surprise here is, once again, either uninformed or hyping.
Getting deeper into the weeds: some news reports have said that companies like Google, Facebook, and the like allowed the government to have direct access to their servers through the actually-not-a-program PRISM program. Thats false.
-snip-
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/eichenwald/2013/06/prism-isnt-data-mining-NSA-scandal
A Good Read
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1268 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PRISM Isn’t Data Mining and Other Falsehoods in the N.S.A. “Scandal” (Original Post)
Tx4obama
Jun 2013
OP
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)1. If the papers know all about the ins and outs of these programs
I wonder why congress has not been briefed in such detail.
BenzoDia
(1,010 posts)2. When one gets caught with their hand in the cookie jar, denial is often the choosen reaction.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)3. Very Interesting, Ma'am
Deserves wide circulation.