Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:03 PM Jun 2013

States jump to implement Voter ID laws after SCOTUS ruling

Now free from federal oversight, states are scrambling to push through restrictive voter registration laws.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott announced Tuesday that the state will now move ahead with a law requiring photo ID before voting, since it no longer has to get pre-clearance from the Department of Justice to implement it. “With today’s decision, the State’s voter ID law will take effect immediately,”

In North Carolina, state Sen. Tom Apodaca, also a Republican, said that the state Legislature will move forward with its own voter ID measure, which passed the state Assembly but has languished in the state Senate until the Court handed down its ruling.

Mississippi Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann was similarly quick to move forward, saying that the state will begin implementing a constitutional amendment, passed by voters, requiring voter ID.

http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/states_jump_at_pushing_voter_id_laws_after_scotus_ruling/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
States jump to implement Voter ID laws after SCOTUS ruling (Original Post) Kablooie Jun 2013 OP
I now have an even lower opinion of people I know who vote republican. CrispyQ Jun 2013 #1
Note that the Justice Department is free to challenge such laws after they pass... PoliticAverse Jun 2013 #2
What you say is true but Progressive dog Jun 2013 #3
But if they implement a law shortly before an election, Kablooie Jun 2013 #5
Right. You can't really clean up the mess of such a law after an election. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2013 #6
Specifically in regards to Texas... PoliticAverse Jun 2013 #4

CrispyQ

(36,470 posts)
1. I now have an even lower opinion of people I know who vote republican.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:05 PM
Jun 2013

How can a decent person support the GOP?

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
2. Note that the Justice Department is free to challenge such laws after they pass...
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 12:07 PM
Jun 2013

just as they've challenged voter ID laws in the past enacted by states that weren't under
the pre-clearance requirement.



Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
5. But if they implement a law shortly before an election,
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 01:05 PM
Jun 2013

it won't be able to go to court until long after the election is over, thus enabling the successful implementation of illegal voting laws.

That was the whole purpose of the original law. To judge the legality of a change before it can bias an election, not years afterwards.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»States jump to implement ...