The Violence of Organized Forgetting
The Violence of Organized ForgettingMonday, 22 July 2013 00:00
By Henry A. Giroux, Truthout | Op-Ed
"People who remember court madness through pain, the pain of the perpetually recurring death of their innocence; people who forget court another kind of madness, the madness of the denial of pain and the hatred of innocence." - James Baldwin
Learning to Forget
America has become amnesiac - a country in which forms of historical, political, and moral forgetting are not only willfully practiced but celebrated. The United States has degenerated into a social order that is awash in public stupidity and views critical thought as both a liability and a threat. Not only is this obvious in the presence of a celebrity culture that embraces the banal and idiotic, but also in the prevailing discourses and policies of a range of politicians and anti-public intellectuals who believe that the legacy of the Enlightenment needs to be reversed. Politicians such as Michelle Bachmann, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich along with talking heads such as Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck and Anne Coulter are not the problem, they are symptomatic of a much more disturbing assault on critical thought, if not rationale thinking itself. Under a neoliberal regime, the language of authority, power and command is divorced from ethics, social responsibility, critical analysis and social costs.
These anti-public intellectuals are part of a disimagination machine that solidifies the power of the rich and the structures of the military-industrial-surveillance-academic complex by presenting the ideologies, institutions and relations of the powerful as commonsense. For instance, the historical legacies of resistance to racism, militarism, privatization and panoptical surveillance have long been forgotten and made invisible in the current assumption that Americans now live in a democratic, post-racial society. The cheerleaders for neoliberalism work hard to normalize dominant institutions and relations of power through a vocabulary and public pedagogy that create market-driven subjects, modes of consciousness, and ways of understanding the world that promote accommodation, quietism and passivity. Social solidarities are torn apart, furthering the retreat into orbits of the private that undermine those spaces that nurture non-commodified knowledge, values, critical exchange and civic literacy. The pedagogy of authoritarianism is alive and well in the United States, and its repression of public memory takes place not only through the screen culture and institutional apparatuses of conformity, but is also reproduced through a culture of fear and a carceral state that imprisons more people than any other country in the world. What many commentators have missed in the ongoing attack on Edward Snowden is not that he uncovered information that made clear how corrupt and intrusive the American government has become - how willing it is to engage in vast crimes against the American public. His real "crime" is that he demonstrated how knowledge can be used to empower people, to get them to think as critically engaged citizens rather than assume that knowledge and education are merely about the learning of skills - a reductive concept that substitutes training for education and reinforces the flight from reason and the goose-stepping reflexes of an authoritarian mindset.
Since the late1970s, there has been an intensification in the United States, Canada and Europe of neoliberal modes of governance, ideology and policies - a historical period in which the foundations for democratic public spheres have been dismantled. Schools, public radio, the media and other critical cultural apparatuses have been under siege, viewed as dangerous to a market-driven society that considers critical thought, dialogue, and civic engagement a threat to its basic values, ideologies, and structures of power. This was the beginning of an historical era in which the discourse of democracy, public values, and the common good came crashing to the ground. Margaret Thatcher in Britain and soon after Ronald Reagan in the United States - both hard-line advocates of market fundamentalism - announced that there was no such thing as society and that government was the problem not the solution. Democracy and the political process were all but sacrificed to the power of corporations and the emerging financial service industries, just as hope was appropriated as an advertisement for a whitewashed world in which the capacity of culture to critique oppressive social practices was greatly diminished. Large social movements fragmented into isolated pockets of resistance mostly organized around a form of identity politics that largely ignored a much-needed conversation about the attack on the social and the broader issues affecting society such as the growing inequality in wealth, power and income. ................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/17647-the-violence-of-organized-forgetting
midnight
(26,624 posts)culture set in that is was ok to pat passengers at airports down, and put them through scanners etc....
xchrom
(108,903 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)Why is it called neoliberal? It sounds neovonservative on its face. Where does this term come from?
libodem
(19,288 posts)And I still don't like the anti-public connotation connection to "liberalism". Interesting how language figures in.
I'm still confused. I will look around and try to do my own research. But if any of you know off the tops of your head, and have a way to explain, please feel free to help me. I do remember seeing "neoliberalism" a few years back in connection with South American policies.
Keeping us educated is the key! Help me.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 23, 2013, 06:26 PM - Edit history (1)
They made liberal a dirty word, and they smeared us with their dirty policies too.
libodem
(19,288 posts)That helps.
PS. I recently noted that you are a male person. I took the 'Mildred' part of your name to denote you as female.
I was fooled for years.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I figured the little guy with the derby would be a clue, but not everybody will see that.
I am painfully straight, as in it is girls, not boys, that float my boat, but it's not something I obsess about except when I'm not getting any.
libodem
(19,288 posts)I remember the little guy with the big nose. I'm on a phone these days so I don't see avatars or signatures unless I click on profiles. And generally I don't check unless it is someone new that seems to spew conservative talking points.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Most of the time I pay about as much attention here as I do watching a Hero Movie. You don't drag out and set up the heavy artillery for light conversation.
TrogL
(32,822 posts)They simply make up their own reality and attempt to thrust it on everybody else.
libodem
(19,288 posts)Of the "think tanks" that conservatives think so much of. They create the narrative and then bend reality to fit the design. Total top down ideology. Very opposite from grassroots governance.
libodem
(19,288 posts)I need to read it again. Maybe before bed. I have to gronk on this a little more.
Wish I could recommend this twice.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)lawyers are fluent in it and it's second nature. I've had relationships with sons and daughters and they carry the same traits over into their lives. It's a kind of "brainfuck" cult/culture that's not for me.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)And that is not something one is born with.
Inside knowledge. There is a kind of ego trip involved, that's why some people get off on it. Being in the club. Like in Henry James, there are people who know and people who don't, and only the people who know really matter.
Not IMHO a good way to run your life though, we agree there.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)I have worked in academia and science and it's prevalent in those institutions as well. I've had the best times in construction work where one can speak their mind. You may get shouted at, but it's always an open argument and one can agree to disagree.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)You are not important. Much more relaxed. I liked that a lot about it.
I found academia more competitive than business, in some ways, intense, but I stayed a student, with a couple exceptions. Business was more various. You get a good boss, it can be great.