Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
UNSCEAR members protest against minimising health effects of Fukushima radiation
http://nuclear-news.net/2013/08/10/unscear-members-protest-against-minimising-health-effects-of-fukushima-radiation/
Shocked UNSCEAR members in Belgium protest It even goes back behind the lessons of Chernobyl and other studies.
Original post: Marc Molitor
Les délégués belges indignés: On minimise les conséquences de Fukushima by Marc Molitor
http://www.rtbf.be/info/societe/detail_les-delegues-belges-indignes-on-minimise-les-consequences-de-fukushima?id=8042566
English translation by Alex Rosen, M.D., Vice-chairman, German IPPNW
Shocked UNSCEAR members in Belgium protest
It even goes back behind the lessons of Chernobyl and other studies.
Discussions continue in UNSCEAR, the organization of the United Nations responsible for assessing the consequences of nuclear disasters and radiation. The committee prepared a report submitted for discussion amongst experts from different countries at a recent meeting in Vienna a report that has aroused the indignation of the Belgian delegation: Everything seems to be written, its members say, to minimize the consequences of the Fukushima disaster. It even goes back behind the lessons of Chernobyl and other studies.
The Belgian delegation includes several experts in the study of nuclear energy. UNSCEAR must submit its report to the General Assembly of the United Nations next fall.
Back in Brussels, the head of delegation, Hans Van Marcke delivered his critical impressions on UNSCEARs conclusions in a presentation to the ABR, the Belgian Association for Radiation Protection. According to our information, the discussions were so tense and the Belgian were so shocked that they threaten not to sign the report and some thought even of leaving the conference. They were offered to include their objections and those of others, mainly English experts in a new, revised document. But the past has shown that it is the secretariat and the rapporteurs who lead the agenda and who give the text its final orientation, and that the greatest vigilance is needed to see to it that the final versions adequately reflects the discussions.
<snip>
Shocked UNSCEAR members in Belgium protest It even goes back behind the lessons of Chernobyl and other studies.
Original post: Marc Molitor
Les délégués belges indignés: On minimise les conséquences de Fukushima by Marc Molitor
http://www.rtbf.be/info/societe/detail_les-delegues-belges-indignes-on-minimise-les-consequences-de-fukushima?id=8042566
English translation by Alex Rosen, M.D., Vice-chairman, German IPPNW
Shocked UNSCEAR members in Belgium protest
It even goes back behind the lessons of Chernobyl and other studies.
Discussions continue in UNSCEAR, the organization of the United Nations responsible for assessing the consequences of nuclear disasters and radiation. The committee prepared a report submitted for discussion amongst experts from different countries at a recent meeting in Vienna a report that has aroused the indignation of the Belgian delegation: Everything seems to be written, its members say, to minimize the consequences of the Fukushima disaster. It even goes back behind the lessons of Chernobyl and other studies.
The Belgian delegation includes several experts in the study of nuclear energy. UNSCEAR must submit its report to the General Assembly of the United Nations next fall.
Back in Brussels, the head of delegation, Hans Van Marcke delivered his critical impressions on UNSCEARs conclusions in a presentation to the ABR, the Belgian Association for Radiation Protection. According to our information, the discussions were so tense and the Belgian were so shocked that they threaten not to sign the report and some thought even of leaving the conference. They were offered to include their objections and those of others, mainly English experts in a new, revised document. But the past has shown that it is the secretariat and the rapporteurs who lead the agenda and who give the text its final orientation, and that the greatest vigilance is needed to see to it that the final versions adequately reflects the discussions.
<snip>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 911 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UNSCEAR members protest against minimising health effects of Fukushima radiation (Original Post)
bananas
Aug 2013
OP
kristopher
(29,798 posts)1. Fukushima 360
This photojournalist has an amazing collection, including a series of photos documenting systematic undercounting of radiation.
Koriyama: As with all official measuring posts checked by me (37 of 1,341) this one also shows a value almost 50% too low compared to my calibrated Geiger counter.
http://www.neureuters.de/umwelt/fukushima