Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 10:28 PM Aug 2013

On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs

by David Graeber.

In the year 1930, John Maynard Keynes predicted that, by century’s end, technology would have advanced sufficiently that countries like Great Britain or the United States would have achieved a 15-hour work week. There’s every reason to believe he was right. In technological terms, we are quite capable of this. And yet it didn’t happen. Instead, technology has been marshaled, if anything, to figure out ways to make us all work more. In order to achieve this, jobs have had to be created that are, effectively, pointless. Huge swathes of people, in Europe and North America in particular, spend their entire working lives performing tasks they secretly believe do not really need to be performed. The moral and spiritual damage that comes from this situation is profound. It is a scar across our collective soul. Yet virtually no one talks about it.

Why did Keynes’ promised utopia – still being eagerly awaited in the ‘60s – never materialise? The standard line today is that he didn’t figure in the massive increase in consumerism. Given the choice between less hours and more toys and pleasures, we’ve collectively chosen the latter. This presents a nice morality tale, but even a moment’s reflection shows it can’t really be true. Yes, we have witnessed the creation of an endless variety of new jobs and industries since the ‘20s, but very few have anything to do with the production and distribution of sushi, iPhones, or fancy sneakers.

So what are these new jobs, precisely? A recent report comparing employment in the US between 1910 and 2000 gives us a clear picture (and I note, one pretty much exactly echoed in the UK). Over the course of the last century, the number of workers employed as domestic servants, in industry, and in the farm sector has collapsed dramatically. At the same time, “professional, managerial, clerical, sales, and service workers” tripled, growing “from one-quarter to three-quarters of total employment.” In other words, productive jobs have, just as predicted, been largely automated away (even if you count industrial workers globally, including the toiling masses in India and China, such workers are still not nearly so large a percentage of the world population as they used to be).

But rather than allowing a massive reduction of working hours to free the world’s population to pursue their own projects, pleasures, visions, and ideas, we have seen the ballooning not even so much of the “service” sector as of the administrative sector, up to and including the creation of whole new industries like financial services or telemarketing, or the unprecedented expansion of sectors like corporate law, academic and health administration, human resources, and public relations. And these numbers do not even reflect on all those people whose job is to provide administrative, technical, or security support for these industries, or for that matter the whole host of ancillary industries (dog-washers, all-night pizza deliverymen) that only exist because everyone else is spending so much of their time working in all the other ones.

These are what I propose to call “bullshit jobs.”


The rest at: http://www.strikemag.org/bullshit-jobs/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs (Original Post) Joe Shlabotnik Aug 2013 OP
. blkmusclmachine Aug 2013 #1
The rest of the article is even better fasttense Aug 2013 #2
Our cultural morality stipulates that all must work. malthaussen Aug 2013 #3
29 hour work week, is a step in that direction...nt quadrature Aug 2013 #4
K&R for an A-1 Superb article. The snippet in the OP doesn't do it justice. Read it all Populist_Prole Aug 2013 #5
in fact, the Walton and Koch families together have enough money for the Doctor_J Aug 2013 #6
 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
2. The rest of the article is even better
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 07:06 AM
Aug 2013

"In capitalism, this is precisely what is not supposed to happen. Sure, in the old inefficient socialist states like the Soviet Union, where employment was considered both a right and a sacred duty, the system made up as many jobs as they had to (this is why in Soviet department stores it took three clerks to sell a piece of meat). But, of course, this is the sort of very problem market competition is supposed to fix. According to economic theory, at least, the last thing a profit-seeking firm is going to do is shell out money to workers they don’t really need to employ. Still, somehow, it happens."

malthaussen

(17,193 posts)
3. Our cultural morality stipulates that all must work.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 09:28 AM
Aug 2013

So in a world where all need not work, we have to find some way to create work for all.

If we accept that only some need to work, then how do we, as a society, decide who does and who does not work? We have not figured that one out, yet.

Ever read "Riders of the Purple Wage?"

-- Mal

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
5. K&R for an A-1 Superb article. The snippet in the OP doesn't do it justice. Read it all
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:19 PM
Aug 2013

He managed to state exactly what I have always thought, but so thoroughly detailed and articulated. It leaves no stone un-turned.

It's flabbergasting at how upside down it all is: That the people with "real" productive or useful jobs are valued the least and the holders of "bullshit jobs" run the show. How'd this happen?

He touches on another great point, that so many think this is the way it should be. The gears in my head are grinding and stripping their teeth in trying to process this.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
6. in fact, the Walton and Koch families together have enough money for the
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 10:41 PM
Aug 2013

entire country to live comfortably with lots of leisure time. So Keynes was right. The resources are available, just allocated incorrectly.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»On the Phenomenon of Bull...