Comment: Politics, Policy, Deadbeats and Default (Bill McBride, Calculated Risk)
Go read the whole thing. Here is your excerpt:
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2013/10/comment-politics-policy-deadbeats-and.html
Shutting down the government just adds to short term costs (pushing up the short term deficit). Dumb.
Smart policy would be to eliminate the so-called "debt ceiling" (really just about paying bills already occurred), and pass the Continuing Resolution (CR) that was negotiated between both parties (and agreed to by both parties except the House added an absurd policy rider).
In addition, smart policy would be to think of ways to address the long term issues. This isn't pressing, and damaging the economy now is not the answer. Perhaps another super-committee with long term consequences if the committee fails (not more short term cuts like the sequester). The consequences should be distasteful to both parties - and both cut spending and raise revenue in the long term so there is some motivation for the committee to reach agreement.
And on deadbeats and defaults: There are certain politicians who think it is OK to not pay the bills as long as the U.S. makes interest and principal payments on the debt. This is crazy talk. There is a name for people who don't pay their bills: deadbeats. If politicians don't pay their personal bills, they are deadbeats. But if they stop the government from paying the bills, we are all deadbeats. And there will be serious economic consequences for not paying the bills on time. The consequences will build over time, but by November not "paying the bills" will ripple through the entire economy.
How does that reduce the deficit (the goal)? It doesn't.
It is time to end the shutdown and agree to pay-the-bills.
Read more at http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2013/10/comment-politics-policy-deadbeats-and.html#zwPexI1vaUcWSUT6.99
= new reply since forum marked as read
