Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,974 posts)
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 02:14 PM Dec 2013

Fiscal Fever Breaks. Krugman

What changed? I’d suggest that at least four things happened to discredit deficit-cutting ideology.

First, the political premise behind “centrism” — that moderate Republicans would be willing to meet Democrats halfway in a Grand Bargain combining tax hikes and spending cuts — became untenable. There are no moderate Republicans. To the extent that there are debates between the Tea Party and non-Tea Party wings of the G.O.P., they’re about political strategy, not policy substance.

Second, a combination of rising tax receipts and falling spending has caused federal borrowing to plunge. This is actually a bad thing, because premature deficit-cutting damages our still-weak economy — in fact, we’d probably be close to full employment now but for the unprecedented fiscal austerity of the past three years. But a falling deficit has undermined the scare tactics so central to the “centrist” cause. Even longer-term projections of federal debt no longer look at all alarming.

Speaking of scare tactics, 2013 was the year journalists and the public finally grew weary of the boys who cried wolf. There was a time when audiences listened raptly to forecasts of fiscal doom — for example, when Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, co-chairmen of Mr. Obama’s debt commission, warned that a severe fiscal crisis was likely within two years. But that was almost three years ago.

Finally, over the course of 2013 the intellectual case for debt panic collapsed. Normally, technical debates among economists have relatively little impact on the political world, because politicians can almost always find experts — or, in many cases, “experts” — to tell them what they want to hear. But what happened in the year behind us may have been an exception.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/30/opinion/krugman-fiscal-fever-breaks.html?hp&rref=opinion

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fiscal Fever Breaks. Krugman (Original Post) elleng Dec 2013 OP
what a great article. Thanks for the post. Bill USA Dec 2013 #1
Thanks, Bill elleng Dec 2013 #2
same here. that first paragraph is great. n/t BlancheSplanchnik Dec 2013 #3
Love it! I always look forward to clicking on his blog every morning. CTyankee Jan 2014 #4

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
1. what a great article. Thanks for the post.
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 08:12 PM
Dec 2013


..."To the extent that there are debates between the Tea Party and non-Tea Party wings of the G.O.P., they’re about political strategy, not policy substance. " !!!


Recommended.


CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
4. Love it! I always look forward to clicking on his blog every morning.
Wed Jan 1, 2014, 12:35 PM
Jan 2014

He's got some great stuff today. Very witty and of course always insightful...

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/31/266-and-all-that/

"currency debasement can ruin your whole day..."

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Fiscal Fever Breaks. Kru...