Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sam1

(498 posts)
Sun Aug 3, 2014, 07:31 AM Aug 2014

No Treatment or Vaccine for Ebola, but a $1000 Pill for Hepatitis C

The Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa continues to grow, and now appears to be the worst known epidemic of that disease to date. In the US and Western Europe, press reports are now raising concerns that the disease could spread there. For example, CNN, in an article entitled "Ebola Fears Hits Close to Home," was a section headed "Could Ebola spread to the US?" An ABC article was entitled, "How the US Government Could Evacuate Americans with Ebola."

Reasons for fear of spread are the increased mobility of people made possible by air travel, and the lack of specificity of early symptoms of Ebola, so infectious people may not realize the dangers their travel might pose. A US citizen with Ebola was on his way back to the US via several connections, and made it as far as Lagos, Nigeria before becoming too ill to travel further (per CNN). Making the fears worse are the high fatality rate of Ebola, the current epidemic included. According to Vox, the current outbreak is the Zaire subtype of the virus, with an expected mortality rate of 68%. Finally, there is no known effective treatment or vaccine for the Ebola virus.

Economics, not Science the Reason for Lack of Medical Options for Ebola


http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2014/07/no-treatment-or-vaccine-for-ebola-but.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No Treatment or Vaccine for Ebola, but a $1000 Pill for Hepatitis C (Original Post) Sam1 Aug 2014 OP
Unsupported assertion. Sometimes science makes uneven progress on point Aug 2014 #1
That the length of time makes little difference is shown by Sam1 Aug 2014 #2
Studying Ebola is not easy. longship Aug 2014 #3
Don't bet on more studying of it Pakid Aug 2014 #4
from the Article: Sam1 Aug 2014 #5
I am aware of that one. longship Aug 2014 #6
Well, don't expect any help for funding research from our Congress..... lastlib Aug 2014 #7

on point

(2,506 posts)
1. Unsupported assertion. Sometimes science makes uneven progress
Sun Aug 3, 2014, 07:56 AM
Aug 2014

Not to mention hepatitis has been around longer, researched longer and impacts more people and is easier to research

Ebola is worth curing, but your rational doesn't follow

Sam1

(498 posts)
2. That the length of time makes little difference is shown by
Sun Aug 3, 2014, 08:53 AM
Aug 2014

the speed and amount of money committed to AIDS research. That hepatitis impacts more people with more money is the very point of the article. And finally the author, himself a doctor, mentions that Ebola research is quite advanced and maybe about as easy as Hepatitis C research.

The authors rational, that the development of an Ebola vaccine would add little to the shareholder value of the developing corporation or the excessive compensation packages of the controlling officers and therefore is not being done, is in my opinion very well supported in the article.

The author, in fact, does do a good job of supporting his contention that in the profit driven world of the MBA, the author calls them generic managers, the lack of a large revenue stream means that Ebola is not worth curing. This is the logic of a market driven world.

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. Studying Ebola is not easy.
Sun Aug 3, 2014, 08:53 AM
Aug 2014

First, because of the danger it likely has to be done within BSL-4 containment, only 15 of which exist within the USA.

So there is not only few facilities to handle it, but few trained to work within such facilities.

The USA has been studying Ebola since its discovery. But one can be sure that they will now be putting more effort into it.

Economics has nothing to do with it, unless it is funding from a science illiterate Congress.

Pakid

(478 posts)
4. Don't bet on more studying of it
Sun Aug 3, 2014, 10:02 AM
Aug 2014

The idiots in the Republican party could careless about any disease unless it will become a problem for the 1% until that happens they will more than likely block any increase in spending on research into it!

Sam1

(498 posts)
5. from the Article:
Sun Aug 3, 2014, 10:16 AM
Aug 2014
Bausch says that the obstacle to developing an Ebola vaccine isn't the science; researchers have actually made really great strides in figuring out how to fight back against Ebola and the Marburg virus, a similar disease.

'We now have a couple of different vaccine platforms that have shown to be protective with non-human primates,' says Bausch, who has received awards for his work containing disease outbreaks in Uganda. He is currently stationed in Lima, Peru, as the director of the emerging infections department of Naval Medical Research Unit 6.



longship

(40,416 posts)
6. I am aware of that one.
Sun Aug 3, 2014, 11:55 AM
Aug 2014

I read about it the other day. In fact one of the two patients being transported to Atlanta was treated with an experimental vaccine, the woman missionary. Maybe they want her in a controlled environment. Or that's what I would want if it was my vaccine.

A vaccine breakthrough would be a big deal.

lastlib

(23,271 posts)
7. Well, don't expect any help for funding research from our Congress.....
Sun Aug 3, 2014, 04:37 PM
Aug 2014

since this affects brown people......

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»No Treatment or Vaccine f...