Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Elizabeth Warren's Q&A of Ben Bernanke at Senate Banking Committee (Original Post) ProfessionalLeftist Feb 2013 OP
This whole perverted system is corrupt to the core. limpyhobbler Feb 2013 #1
Bernanke, like all the rest of those miscreants, treating markets as if they're truth2power Feb 2013 #2
"I think we should get rid of it" Canuckistanian Feb 2013 #3
Thank you!!!! dixiegrrrrl Feb 2013 #4
Bernanke gives up trying to defend it--"we should get rid of it" SunSeeker Feb 2013 #5
Doing what we elected her to do MannyGoldstein Feb 2013 #6
Why, Oh Why grandpamike1 Feb 2013 #7
Trying to get decent people to expose themselves to the expensive efhmc Feb 2013 #8
Here's the full exchange Iwillnevergiveup Feb 2013 #9
Elizabeth Warren... supercats Feb 2013 #10
Raise a special tax to get that $83 Billion back and... Amonester Feb 2013 #11
Go Lizzie, go! onwardsand upwards Feb 2013 #12

truth2power

(8,219 posts)
2. Bernanke, like all the rest of those miscreants, treating markets as if they're
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 10:22 PM
Feb 2013

some living entity. They're an economic construct.

People need to look at what Prof. Richard Wolff has to say about markets. Maybe I can find it.

SunSeeker

(51,559 posts)
5. Bernanke gives up trying to defend it--"we should get rid of it"
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 11:23 PM
Feb 2013

The video clip stops at that point, but my next question would be, "So why don't we, Ben?"

But of course we all know the Republicans would never go for that. They have no problem with CORPORATE welfare. Even free insurance to big Banks worth $ 83 Billion a year. Welfare is only bad when it helps actual people.

grandpamike1

(193 posts)
7. Why, Oh Why
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 11:51 PM
Feb 2013

Can't the Democrats find more people to run for office like Senator Warren ? There should be an easy answer for this, but apparently neither the Dems or Reps want to delve into the financial snake pit that is our financial system. I just hope they keep televising these hearings so that many more voters will see the mendacity of our elected Government.

Bravo Senator, Bravo.....

efhmc

(14,726 posts)
8. Trying to get decent people to expose themselves to the expensive
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 12:27 AM
Feb 2013

slime pit which is our current political system is very hard and has the potential to get even worse.

Iwillnevergiveup

(9,298 posts)
9. Here's the full exchange
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 01:34 AM
Feb 2013

beginning at 1:46.

What is so interesting is that Vitter came on right after Elizabeth and agreed with her!
He said there is evidence that "too big to fail is alive and well."

http://www.c-span.org/Events/Fed-Chair-Bernanke-Presents-Monetary-Policy-Report-to-Congress/10737438337-1/

 

supercats

(429 posts)
10. Elizabeth Warren...
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 03:03 AM
Feb 2013

is the best thing to happen to our senate in a long time! She is actually doing what she said she would do, and I love her for it!!!

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
11. Raise a special tax to get that $83 Billion back and...
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 04:15 AM
Feb 2013

take $3 Billion of it to set up and pay for a true Public Campaign-Funding program to share between each qualified candidate

render lobbying illegal

then take the remaining $80 Billion to avert the sequester


voilà.

 

onwardsand upwards

(276 posts)
12. Go Lizzie, go!
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 11:06 AM
Feb 2013

She stands up to Bernanke very well.

Bernanke's answer, overall, is a classical economist's bob-and-weave: it's not possible for these extra profits to exist with rational expectations -- therefore, rather than tax them (oh, heavens, no) we just need to adjust people's expectations to be more rational. The problem isn't that banks are fleecing the people -- it's that the people are too stupid to trust us that we wouldn't bail the banks out again (in the way the we always, always, have). Assume the issue doesn't exist, and it doesn't exist! His smug little professorial smile betrays how much he enjoys this type of argument.

I'm not quite sure what he means when he says "Now we have the tools". He seems to be implying that the Fed had its hands tied, in 2008, in a way that it doesn't now. That sounds good but, given that the Fed is a corporation owned by the big banks, it seems pretty unlikely that they'd do anything other than act in their interests when push comes to shove.

In any case, it's such a pleasure to see someone asking these questions in such a forthright way.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Elizabeth Warren's Q&...