Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumPic of the Moment: Sean Hannity: Hypocritical Partisan Hack
Sean Hannity On NSA Surveillance, Then And Now (by Media Matters)
Follow @demunderground
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Hannity = No integrity. No honor. No truth. Degenerate Republican chickenhawk hypocrite 'values' all the way. As usual.
timdog44
(1,388 posts)patriotism in any of his bloodcells. He is all about $$$$$$
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)but I think Greenwald said something about slavishly partisan media Republicans who are being hypocritical about this.
Can someone help an old guy out and point me to a link?
Flashmann
(2,140 posts)Asshat extrordinaire...
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)He just can't help himself.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Just Saying
(1,799 posts)He can count on the Faux News crowd to have no short or long term memory.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)both times, lots of us are defending this crap now. It was wrong under Bush, and it is still wrong.
carolinayellowdog
(3,247 posts)OK now, but not under Bush
reusrename
(1,716 posts)More like two sides of the same coin.
a2liberal
(1,524 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,460 posts)titanicdave
(429 posts)that an idea under a rethug president is great, but under a democratic president, it is tantamount to treason......so once again, Hannity proves the idiocy and hypocrisy of the twits that broadcast on fixed noise.....
frylock
(34,825 posts)hope you were shooting for irony on this one.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)reflection
(6,286 posts)Too bad his audience could look at it and somehow rationalize it.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Everyone piles on.
Initech
(100,081 posts)Under Bush: "We're protecting your safety."
Under Obama: "It's big brother fascism! It is going to destroy the country!"
Where were these morons 10 years ago?
chuckstevens
(1,201 posts)Does anyone REALLY think Sean Hannity has the intellectual capacity to have an informed opinion? This guy is a ZERO and wouldn't even understand why anyone would think he's a hypocrite. The only one stupider than Hannity are his viewers.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)I've thought that for a long time.
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)Talking from both sides of his mouth. Of coure he favors the side where he can taste the butter on the bread.
lupulin
(58 posts)to find out he's been on tv all this time and is still on. The few times I've heard him he seemed like a random phrase generator.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)Thank you for continuing to produce original content for the site!
Good stuff!
PB
Daemonaquila
(1,712 posts)That doesn't keep him from being a hack and a hypocrite, though.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)alp227
(32,034 posts)RevStPatrick
(2,208 posts)I don't often use language like that, but Hannity brings out the worst in me.
I truly hate that toad.
I don't hate very often either, but like I said, Hannity brings out the worst in me.
There's just something about this smarmy little fuck-wad, that just... well... brings out the worst in me.
And that's the agenda.
That's why he's on TV.
Not to inform, but to obfuscate.
To turn normally reasonable, rational people into haters.
Mission accomplished!
God, I hate that little fuck-face douche-nozzle.
That is hilarious!!!!
Ganja Ninja
(15,953 posts)That's why I'm having such a problem getting worked up over all of this. While I welcome the idea of regaining some semblance of privacy I can't help but be disgusted buy the blatant disingenuous attempt at partisan framing of this by the right. I'm under no illusion that their new found angst is sincere.
TRoN33
(769 posts)I already expected Hannity to talk like that very momentarily after the revelation of PRISM and NSA programs. Even I never really like watch Hannity's show but his reputation sure are too predictable for well thinking people.
panzerfaust
(2,818 posts)Obama's even more deeply intrusive, more widespread, and even less constitutional surveillance police state.
It is not about Bush or Obama, Republican or Democrat - it is about those who support a constitutional government and those who support some form of totalitarianism.
The Guardian (who else?) has an interesting article by the Chinese artist and thinker Ai Weiwei discussing the destructive power that curtailment of individual privacy by an out-of-control government has on those who live in such a society.
NSA surveillance: The US is behaving like China
Both governments think they are doing what is best for the state and people. But, as I know, such abuse of power can ruin lives
...
In the Soviet Union before, in China today, and even in the US, officials always think what they do is necessary, and firmly believe they do what is best for the state and the people. But the lesson that people should learn from history is the need to limit state power.
More ... http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/11/nsa-surveillance-us-behaving-like-china
Orwell wrote that "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human faceforever." It is disheartening to me to see so many people anxious to place that boot on their own faces. Perhaps Mussolini was right - see my sig line.
How sad that even the Neo NAZI's can see the danger (note link to Obama image) in a surveillance state when many progressives seem blind to the power they wish to give the state over all people. To quote again from Nineteen Eighty-Four: "Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres inside your skull."
Is this really the future that you want?
Please recall the words and heed the warning of President Woodrow Wilson: "The history of freedom is a history of limiting governmental power." Our last two presidents have done more to undermine American constitutional freedoms than any two presidents in history.
progressoid
(49,991 posts)See??
panzerfaust
(2,818 posts)when he, as Senator Obama, voted against confirming Hayden as CIA director in protest of the Bush administration's illegal and unconstitutional abrogation of the right of Americans to be free of unwarranted intrusion into their lives by NSA's illegal (and quite limited by this administration's standards) information gathering.
"I have no doubt that General Hayden will be confirmed. But I am going to reluctantly vote against him to send a signal to this administration that even in these circumstances, even in these trying times, President Bush is not above the law. No President is above the law. I am voting against Mr. Hayden in the hope that he will be more humble before the great weight of responsibility that he has not only to protect our lives but to protect our democracy.
Americans fought a Revolution in part over the right to be free from unreasonable searchesto ensure that our Government could not come knocking in the middle of the night for no reason. We need to find a way forward to make sure we can stop terrorists while protecting the privacy and liberty of innocent Americans. We have to find a way to give the President the power he needs to protect us, while making sure he does not abuse that power. It is possible to do that. We have done it before. We could do it again."
Senator Obama
Given the relative positions of power and responsibility of Obama and Hannity, I must say that, of the two hypocrites, Obama is the bigger, and certainly the more dangerous.
Time, Mr President, to get to working on that great IngSoc invention: The memory hole. Or, perhaps better, time to try and recall that you were once a principled man, and to re-embrace those principles which protect a free society.
been lurking at the du since the bush admin. started posting because you've adopted the ideology i oppose.
bush was evil incarnate and anyone who supports his beliefs deserves the same fate.
Response to panzerfaust (Reply #30)
JTFrog This message was self-deleted by its author.
adieu
(1,009 posts)Democrats (for the most part) didn't like it when Bush surveilled people, and don't like it now when Obama is doing the same thing.
Republicans: they're all right when it's a Republican doing it, but not all right when it's a Democrat doing it.
a2liberal
(1,524 posts)Unfortunately, a lot of Democrats (here!) feel that it's alright when Obama does it but not when Bush did it. Just look at all the threads making fun of those against the spying that make it to the front page. Also, some Republicans are consistent and are going after Snowden for the leak for "endangering national security" just like they would've under Bush.
demwing
(16,916 posts)The guy has just too much of a sphincter to face ratio. Even the mention of his name would make Ghandi want to punch the Buddha.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)He looks like he has two dark, shellacked buttocks on top of his head.
Then I got to thinking, and you know what that head reminds me of?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Yes it was made legal in 2006 and Obama continued the program. It is supposed to be done with the oversight of the FISA court and other agencies. Shame barks to any tune they tell him to do, FAUX puppet.
indepat
(20,899 posts)Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)tanyev
(42,571 posts)markiv
(1,489 posts)tell me it isnt sooooo!
you gotta at least give him credit for truth in labeling, you know what you are listeneing to
DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)all the way to the bank......