Secret Court Destroys Your Constitutional Rights

[rdubwiley]

[DhhD]

1. This secrecy is like, if you are permitted to vote, then vote, then shut the Hell up until the

next election and hope you will be allowed to vote again. Just change out the word vote in the above sentence and put in another one of your Constitutional rights so you can understand the new America that we are living in. For instance switch to the word speak: If you are permitted to speak then speak and shut the hell up until you are given permission to speak again because anything you say will be used against you by some secret bunch of overlords that have discarded the Constitution as it is nothing but a GD piece of paper to them.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/12/14/171901/-Bush-on-the-Constitution-It-s-just-a-goddamned-piece-of-paper#

[baldguy]

2. More of the same Paulbot lunacy.

[rdubwiley]

3. Uh

What are you even talking about? This is happening. I'm a liberal who voted for Obama twice, and I dislike Ron Paul very much. However, I care about constitutional rights, regardless of the party of the President who's taking them away.

[20score]

4. If you believe this is the right thing to do, prove it.

If you can't make your case, you either don't know enough, or you don't have a case to make.

People who label and insult because they have no real argument, are usually both ignorant and wrong. Not the best combination.

Go ahead and prove to me you are knowledgeable about this issue. (You'll be the first on your side I've encountered.)

[baldguy]

5. I don't believe painting the current US govt as "Big Brother" is the reight thing to do.

It's pure bullshit & feeds into the RW-Paulbot-Teabagger narrative that's bent on destroying this country.

If you believe that's the right thing to do, prove it.

[20score]

6. Are you kidding?

If you really don't know what's going on, don't talk about it until you do.

Are you saying they're not spying on us? That's ridiculous.

Make your damn case. Saying, "not true" is the same argument one would get from a young-earther.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2013/05/first-aclu-now-nyt-blasts-obama-for-spying-on-media/

http://www.naturalnews.com/040738_NSA_spying_New_York_Times_Obama_Administration.html

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/06/06/washington-post-nsa-spying-included-major-internet-giants

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/06/06/washington-post-nsa-spying-included-major-internet-giants

http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/License-plate-readers-tracking-cars-4622476.php

Tell us way the spying is good. Denying it is beyond belief.

[baldguy]

7. I think this is the site you're looking for:

http://www.infowars.com/

[20score]

8. Pathetic.

I'm done. It's like arguing with a climate change denier or a young-earther.

[rdubwiley]

9. Lol

I'm pretty sure he's trolling you.

[baldguy]

10. Or a Paulbot.

Trotting out the tired old rhetoric that has no similarity to the real world.

Next you'll be telling everyone that fluoridation is a mind control plot & that they need to buy gold.

[rdubwiley]

11. A song for you

[blkmusclmachine]

12. 1984

Police State

9/11

Operation: Northwoods