Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumBill O'Reilly Falsely Claims Republicans Barred From March On Washington
Fox host Bill O'Reilly falsely claimed that "no Republicans and no conservatives were invited" to participate in attend the anniversary of the March on Washington. Several prominent Republicans were invited, but chose not to attend.
On the August 28 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly hosted Democratic strategist James Carville to discuss the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington. During the discussion, O'Reilly complained that President George W. Bush was not invited to speak. O'Reilly later claimed that "[n]o Republicans and no conservatives were invited." O'Reilly went on to respond to Rep. John Lewis' statement that "we're all in the same boat" by asking "Where's the conservative side to that boat?"
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/08/28/bill-oreilly-falsely-claims-republicans-barred/195656
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1808 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill O'Reilly Falsely Claims Republicans Barred From March On Washington (Original Post)
WhoIsNumberNone
Aug 2013
OP
And Sen Tim Scott WAS invited too, but declined the invitation - see DU OP link below
Tx4obama
Aug 2013
#2
What O'Reilly did not say is the coward conseratives are too scared of their base to attend. They
Thinkingabout
Aug 2013
#6
Republicans are on a war path to disenfranchise black voters....Why the hell should they be invited?
W T F
Aug 2013
#8
Billo knows his audience isn't going to know better because they aren't into computers....
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2013
#9
Kingofalldems
(38,454 posts)1. He actually took O'Reilly at his word. Big mistake.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)2. And Sen Tim Scott WAS invited too, but declined the invitation - see DU OP link below
Senator Tim Scott Turned Down Invitation to 50th Anniversary of MLK Speech
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023559365
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)3. It was directed at the tea drinkers
Where facts don't matter.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)4. No matter what the color what do neo-cons work toward, Equality ???
Blabba O'wiley should be institutionalized .
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)5. Some folks carry a bottle of oxygen to survive
I'm betting Bill-O carries a bottle of compressed farts he ventilates from. That's why everything this buffoon extols, smells like shit.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)6. What O'Reilly did not say is the coward conseratives are too scared of their base to attend. They
Were invited and chose to stay away.
CincyDem
(6,355 posts)7. Classic Billo
Create a false argument on faulty data and then get everyone to agree with his conclusion, without every discussing the veracity of the starting point.
The way he bastardizes logic is criminal.
W T F
(1,146 posts)8. Republicans are on a war path to disenfranchise black voters....Why the hell should they be invited?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)9. Billo knows his audience isn't going to know better because they aren't into computers....
Except the one monitoring their vitals.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)10. I am shocked,
Shocked, to discover that Billo said something that was not in strict conformation to the absolute truth.
I mean, if you can't trust a conservative propagandist, who can you trust?
I mean, if you can't trust a conservative propagandist, who can you trust?