Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnyCanuck

(9,922 posts)
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 03:49 PM Dec 2013

Legalized fraud, an excerpt from last Wednesday's Daily show.

In a nutshell:
Company (A), the private equity firm Blackstone, takes out a Credit Default Swap against an unrelated company (B), named Codere. In case Codere should fail to meet its debt obligations, Blackstone can then collect a substantial sum of money by virtue of having acquired this Credit Default Swap.

Blackstone then makes a loan to Codere of 100 million dollars with the proviso that Codere upon accepting the loan will intentionally delay a payment it owes to another company, let's call it company (C), until past the due date - meaning the Credit Default Swap will kick in and result in a payout to Blackstone. Codere then delays a debt repayment to Company (C) by 2 days past the due date as required by the terms of their loan agreement with Blackstone, the Credit Default Swap is triggered and Blackstone collects a cool $15.6 million thanks to their financial (and apparently legal) sleight of hand.

Jon Stewart sends ace financial reporter Samantha Bee to investigate and report back on why this legalized fraud received no publicity in the mainstream media.

Video at link:
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-december-4-2013/blackstone---codere

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
1. thanks for posting - and the fake lying scum dog editor from the NYT,
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 04:07 PM
Dec 2013

the paper of record, says this kind of fraud is business as usual.

Nice.

The NYT is complicit.

edit - If you are not boycotting the NYT, you should be.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
2. Sadly, it is business as usual.
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 04:18 PM
Dec 2013

And most of the laws passed to curb this kind of behavior are still "unenforced" and so it's still a legal gray area that banks can play in, while they lobby to have the unenforced rules repealed.

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
5. Law enforcement (aka "government regulators") paid to look away
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 06:04 PM
Dec 2013

Wall street has bought the government with their dirty money.

We need about 250 Lizzy Warrens in congress to back out of this thing. It is out of control.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
7. The problem is that "If you're not boycotting EVERYTHING
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 11:10 PM
Dec 2013

you should be" is a completely true statement, AND wholly unworkable.

There is so much shit to boycott. In nearly every institution, every area of society, and every corner of the planet there is something going on that is more than worthy of a boycott. So how does one manage to not end up being overwhelmed?

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
8. It is easy for me to boycott the Times. I get zero newspapers.
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 12:11 AM
Dec 2013

I also boycott a few other businesses. Not everything that deserves to be boycotted - but a select few. But I don't feel guilty/bad for not boycotting the whole world.

Being overwhelmed is part of life. Bad stuff happens. If you think about it, everything you do is bad for somebody or something.

JohnyCanuck

(9,922 posts)
9. Increasing prevalance of economic shysterism on Wall Street, is it just greed run amok, or ....
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 07:41 AM
Dec 2013

is it rather a symptom of the deleterious effects increasing energy costs have on the economy's ability to sustain economic growth?

Growth is Obsolete
Society needs to realize growth does not equal prosperity

By James Howard Kunstler

We are in the third act of the industrial melodrama now where the dire sub-plot of peak oil has taken stage. Despite the wishful thinking and happy-talk propaganda lighting up the media-space, we have arrived at the problematic point of the story: the end of cheap oil. This is poorly understood by the public and, apparently, by leaders in business, politics, and the media, too. They misunderstand because they insist on thinking that peak oil was simply about running out of oil. It’s not. It’s about running out of the ability to extract it from the earth in a way that makes economic sense — that is, at a price we can afford in terms of available capital and energy invested (and also ecological destruction). That dynamic is now exerting a powerful influence on modern civilizations. We ignore it -- even at the highest levels of intellectual endeavor -- because we have made no alternate plans for running the complex operations of everyday life, and because the early manifestations of the dynamic present themselves in the realm of finance, which is dominated by academic viziers and money-grubbing opportunists who benefit from obfuscating reality.

snip

It is quite clear that the banking system has been thrown into great disarray as the price of oil levitated from $11-a-barrel in 1999 to the great spike of $140 in 2008, and then settled into a range between $75 and $110 since 2010. Most of this disarray is a result of attempts to offset the failure to create new real wealth with fake wealth generated by accounting fraud, "innovative" swindling, insider chicanery, high frequency front-running, naked shorting of securities, and the construction of a vast untested network of derivative counterparty wagers that give every sign of being booby-trapped. All this private monkey business has been abetted by public mischief in central bank interventions and market manipulations, fiscal irresponsibility, political payoffs for favorable legislation, statistical misreporting, and the failure to apply the rule of law in cases of blatant misconduct (e.g., the MF Global confiscation of segregated client accounts; the Goldman Sachs “Timberwolf” CDO scam… the list is very long).

In short, a society with deeply impaired capital formation has turned to crime, corruption, fakery, and subterfuge in order to pretend that “growth” — i.e. expansion of capital — is still happening. The consequences are many and profound. The chief one is that the manufacture of fake wealth is such an alluring activity that some of the smartest people in society have devoted their waking hours to making a profit off it. It absorbs all their energies and they are simply not available for other work, such as figuring out a sane and practical way to run civilization in the absence of cheap energy. Added to this is the administrative effort and the work-arounds needed to support all this corruption and dishonesty, which occupy the hours of another class of smart people who work in government, academia, public relations, and the media. The sustenance of these parasitical cohorts more and more continues at the expense of everybody else in society, who cannot find work, or cannot make enough money to pay their living expenses, and who have become deeply discouraged, disappointed, demoralized, and disengaged in their losing struggle to thrive. Hence there is little public vigor to even mount a discussion of these vexing problems and the final result is the greater wholesale failure to construct a coherent consensus about what is happening to us and what we might do about it.

http://www.peakprosperity.com/blog/83221/growth-obsolete

JohnyCanuck

(9,922 posts)
10. Rising Energy Costs Lead to Recession; Eventually Collapse
Mon Dec 9, 2013, 07:15 AM
Dec 2013
By Gail Tverberg (AKA Gail The Actuary)

SNIP

The Limits to Growth analysis modeled the world economy in terms of flows; it did not try to model the financial system. In recent years, I have been looking at the situation and have discovered that as we hit limits in a finite world, the financial system is the most vulnerable part of the system because it ties everything else together. Debt in particular is vulnerable because the time-shifting aspect of debt “works” much better in a rapidly growing economy than in an economy that is barely growing or shrinking.

The problem that now looks like it has the potential to push the world into financial collapse is something no one would have thought of—high oil prices that take a slice out of the economy, without anything to show in return. Consumers find that their own salaries do not rise as oil prices rise. They find that they need to cut back on discretionary spending if they are to have adequate funds to pay for necessities produced using oil. Food is one such necessity; oil is used to run farm equipment, make herbicides and pesticides, and transport finished food products. The result of a cutback in discretionary spending is recession or near recession, and less job availability. Governments find themselves in financial distress from trying to mitigate the recession-like impacts without adequate tax revenue.

snip

Recently, since about 2004, we have again been encountering high oil prices. Unfortunately, the easy options to fix them are mostly gone. We have run out of cheap energy options—tight oil from shale formations isn’t cheap. Wages again are stagnating, even worse than before. The positive feedback loop based on low energy prices that we had been experiencing when oil prices were low isn’t working nearly as well, and economic growth rates are falling.

The technical name for the problem we are running into with oil is diminishing marginal returns. This represents a situation where more and more inputs are used in extraction, but these additional inputs add very little more in the way of the desired output, which is oil. Oil companies find that an investment of a given amount, say $1,000 dollars, yields a much smaller amount of oil than it used to in the past—often less than a fourth as much. There are often more up-front expenses in drilling the wells, and less certainty about the length of time that oil can be extracted from a new well.

Oil that requires high up-front investment needs a high price to justify its extraction. When consumers pay the high oil price, the amount they have for discretionary goods drops. The feedback loop starts working the wrong direction—in the direction of more layoffs, and lower wages for those working. Companies, including oil companies, have a harder time making a profit. They find outsourcing labor costs to lower-cost parts of the world more attractive.

http://ourfiniteworld.com/2013/10/23/rising-energy-costs-lead-to-recession-eventually-collapse/#more-38555
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Legalized fraud, an excer...