Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumGlenn Greenwald: "U.S. Corporate Media is "Neutered, Impotent"--Democracy Now, Part II
Last edited Wed May 14, 2014, 07:32 PM - Edit history (2)
Published on May 14, 2014
http://www.democracynow.org - In the final part of our extended interview, Glenn Greenwald reflects on the Pulitzer Prize, adversarial journalism and the corporate media's response to his reporting on Edward Snowden's leaked National Security Agency documents. "We knew that once we started publishing not one or two stories, but dozens of stories ... that not just the government, but even fellow journalists were going to start to look at what we were doing with increasing levels of hostility and to start to say, 'This doesn't actually seem like journalism anymore,' because it's not the kind of journalism that they do," Greenwald says. "It doesn't abide by these unspoken rules that are designed to protect the government."
Watch the full interview with Glenn Greenwald, as well as all Democracy Now! interviews with him over the past year:
Category
News & Politics
License
Standard YouTube License
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)i was just wondering when he'd do a longform interview.
just got the book on kindle and noticed that it's #1 in the computer/tech category on amazon.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)//INTERCEPT so figure if I want color after I read the book..I can get them there.
There is a Part I interview that Amy did yesterday which is excellent.
I made mistake in posting Pt. II before PT. I....so maybe I will add that.
SamKnause
(13,107 posts)Imagine if mainstream media modeled themselves after Democracy Now.
Imagine the kind of government we could have.
Imagine corporations being held accountable.
Imagine war criminals being prosecuted.
Imagine politicians being fact checked.
Imagine the power it would give we the people.
Imagine knowing the truth and making informed decisions.
Imagine the presidential debates we could have.
I repeat, Democracy Now ROCKS !!!!!!!!!
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)but NPR is yet another sellout corporate media so I guess 6 minutes with Amy beats an hour with Terry.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)How was the Terri Gross interview? Was it good?
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)hit the major points. You can hear it on npr.org -- just hit the link to her show.
Since Goodman actually did spend a lot of time with him, I'll try to get the time to watch.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)She dissects GG with aplomb and precision, right down to his ambulance chasing roots.
Thats right. A whistleblower breaks the law to obtain 50,000 documents, he flees the country to escape prosecution and jail time, he hands over these 50,000 pages to a handful of individuals in return for their promise to present these documents to the public, six months pass, and the public gets 1% of these documents. But please, wait. This is not all. Far more interesting and troubling things happen meanwhile.
The main wanna-be reporter begins his relentless pursuit of high dollars in return for for what? In return for exclusive interviews where he would discuss some of this material. In return for a very lucrative book deal where he would expose a few extra pages of these 50,000-page documents. In return for a partnership with and extremely high salary from a Mega Corporation (think 1%) where he would hmmmm, well, it is not very clear: maybe in return for sitting on and never releasing some of these documents, or, releasing a few select pages?
Thats right. The culprit is able to use his role in the whistleblower case, and his de facto ownership of the whistleblowers 50,000-page evidence, to gain huge sums of money, fame, a mega corporate position, book and movie deals yet, making sure that the public would never see more than a few percent of the incriminating evidence.
Of course, secondhand checkbook profiteers tend to be very savvy, able to blow smoke, muddy water, and obscure their real deeds and true personhoods. This particular one is famous for spending years as an ambulance-chasing style attorney, where all he had to do was to write dozens of pages to make cases that were never cases, or make real cases appear as if they never were.
- See more at: http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2013/12/08/checkbook-journalism-leaking-to-the-highest-bidders/#sthash.esuPxh6S.dpuf
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)exclusively to keep citizens equally ignorant, angry and fearful. So as to easily sell the citizen products peddled by other fellow corporations.
Almost two thirds of patriotic exceptional Americans do not know which party controls which house of Congress says it all.
ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)Great coverage of the whole mess.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/
drynberg
(1,648 posts)Glen talks about "obsolete media reporters", and I like to think of these same reporters as irrelevant and apologists (for Big Money, etc.).