Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumJim Webb Stealth Republican Vice Presidential Candidate ?
http://debatez.com/forum/discussion/1908/jim-webb-s-stealth-campaign-to-become-republican-vice-presidentThe Velveteen Ocelot
(115,693 posts)He's way too conservative for my liking but he's not a criminally insane Bible-banger so they won't want him. He might have made it as a Republican 40 years ago but the current GOP would consider him a flaming lefty.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Notice the hysteria over Bernie Sanders not being a "real" Democrat even though he has caucused with Democrats his entire political career. His officially being an independent has lots of people in an uproar.
Webb? He's a Democrat. Too conservative for my taste, but nonetheless he's a Democrat and won an election under that banner. He's not right-wing enough to switch parties, and even if he did he's not going to be remotely acceptable to Republicans in the v-p slot.
Pretty much every election cycle there's some fantasy about someone switching parties and running as president or v-p with the other party, but it will never happen. In 2004 there was a lot of nonsense out there about McCain switching parties and becoming Kerry's running mate, but that was always just about pure fantasy. For reasons I've never quite understood there was a myth about McCain that he was some sort of liberal, and that was never true.
Party politics operate at a very different level from the way most of us here do our politics.
merrily
(45,251 posts)The OP seems more concerned with the left right divide than technicalities. In the highly unlikely event that Webb becomes the party's nominee,ead of us will have to decide whether we can vote for him or not, simply because he changed party registrations before running for the Senate. Until then, we can admit that he may be far more akin to Reagan than to FDR or LBJ.
asjr
(10,479 posts)only had one term as senator and when he did not re-up it made me think he just is not ready for prime time.
merrily
(45,251 posts)As soon as I heard him mention "white culture" whille publicizing one of his books, I winced. However, he was running against Allen, who had called an Indian "macaca" then lied about the meaning of the word. Never thought he'd run for President.
He thought the Tailhook scandal was a "spun up" witch hunt.
http://www.jameswebb.com/articles/military-and-veterans/witch-hunt-in-the-navy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tailhook_scandal.
His wikipedia doesn't inspire a lot of confidence in me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Webb
See also http://thinkprogress.org/election/2014/11/21/3595651/jim-webb-2016/
Anyway, which serious candidate for POTUS announces via a post on his blog?
Obviously, my primary vote is FOR Sanders, but I don't mind that is also against Webb.
asjr
(10,479 posts)just as pleased with Sanders. Looking at the slate of dumb and dumber on the Republican side scares me to death!
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)It's central to being elected.
Which is why Bernie Sanders is such an anomaly, and why his caucusing with Dems all these years really does matter. If he'd been a total independent, caucusing with neither party, he'd never have any influence of any kind, and his attempt to run for President now would be a joke. Instead, his independent stance has allowed him to speak his mind over the years, while his association with the Democratic Party makes his running as one possible.
Party registration when you run for office matters a great deal. Elected officials sometimes change parties and go on to win elections again, but it's not very common, and almost never happens at high levels.
Jim Webb has pretty much zero chance of winning the Democratic nomination, and probably even less of a chance of the the Republican vp slot.
merrily
(45,251 posts)It's literally impossible for anyone who lives in Vermont--and a number of other forward-looking states--to register as a Democrat, or as anything but simply as a voter.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)of those running for office.
There are several states that don't require party registration to vote, or where the primaries are totally open. That's not what I mean.
It's the party that the candidate is registered or affiliated with.
I think you didn't understand what I thought I'd clearly stated.
MiniMe
(21,716 posts)But he used to be a Republican, was even in Reagan's cabinet. George Bush "made" him a democrat because of the Iraq/Afghanistan war, but he still thinks like a republican.
jalan48
(13,865 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)of the party any more ...
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)That is to have a candidate in the field that will work to build the idea that Hillary is a Liberal. Nothing more. He will undoubtedly make comments to the effect that the Democratic Party has moved too far to the left, and that Hillary is a part of that movement. It's all political manipulation carefully choreographed to combat the "Hillary is a centrist " talk, and convince folks to think she 'must be a Liberal' because Webb says so.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)to help Hillary? I find that rather implausible.
People run for office because they honestly think they can win it.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)For no other reason THAN that.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)They do it to win. On rare occasions they're hoping that some particular stand of theirs gets noticed. But they don't do it to benefit someone else.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)completely and in some cases, probably MOST cases you're logically correct. But it's not inconceivable that the Bernie phenomenon caught them with their pants down when their usual "go to" memes they typically use to brush liberals off as an afterthought weren't catching on, he continued to gain in the polls. Anyway, this is simply MY theory...you certainly don't have to subscribe to it.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)To say nothing of the fact that he has the charisma of a damp turnip.