Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumAnd the Winner of this years Darwin Award goes to.......
Never try to kill a spider on your gasoline nozzle with a lighter
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Jeez.
ashling
(25,771 posts)wouldn't he actually have to clear the gene pool?
sarge43
(28,941 posts)Winning a Darwin involves taking yourself out of the gene pool - death by dumbness or screwing up your reproductive functions.
This is just "You are the luckiest sob on the planet, dude" award.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)If you you purge yourself via your own stupidity before you reproduce, you can compete.
If you have already reproduced, you get an honorable mention.
If you render yourself sterile, you get an honorable mention.
This is just a dumbass. I do give him a 6 for flair however.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)The moron didn't actually die, so his genes are still in the gene pool, making the species dumber!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)He must not have been carrying a grenade.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)They are so rarely that bellicose.
--imm
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)a pugnacious critter.
W T F
(1,147 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)I agree with those who've pointed out that, at present, he's still in the gene pool and therefore ineligible.
The issue that would be presented by a shooting is whether the Darwin Awards recognize consequences other than immediate consequences.
LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)PosterChild
(1,307 posts)NBachers
(17,110 posts)jimlup
(7,968 posts)A close 2nd is the guy who set off a fire cracker on his head on July 4th.
Both of these actually qualified as both died.