Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumDemocracy Now: A CIA tie to JFK Assassination? Book on Ex-Director Allen Dulles Questions
Agency's Role
http://www.democracynow.org/2015/10/19/a_cia_tie_to_jfk_assassination
longship
(40,416 posts)Which pretty much shows that Lee Harvey Oswald was the only shooter in Dallas who shot JFK and Governor Connelly. There might have been a thousand shooters elsewhere, but the shots that made the difference came from the Texas Book Depositary building.
There is no doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK and Connelly. If one has a conspiracy theory that disputes that one must first falsify the forensic evidence, which is fairly characterized as indisputable. That is unless one just makes shit up.
I read Mark Lane's Rush to Judgement when it was first published in the 60's. He made, what appeared to be a compelling argument. But, what I learned by studying these kind of JFK arguments over the years is that there really is no coherent argument that Oswald was not the sole shooter on that day, and all of the forensic and circumstantial evidence points to only Oswald.
Now many claim that Oswald was part of a grand conspiracy -- his death by the hand of Jack Ruby certainly seemed like a silencing. However, if one looks closely at Oswald and Ruby, one sees not two people part of a grand conspiracy, but a couple of real losers.
One cannot put forth a JFK assassination grand conspiracy without responding to both the indisputable forensic evidence and the psychology of Oswald and indeed Ruby.
Historic events are often messy affairs. However, when one analyses such things, one should not make shit up. There is no doubt that Oswald shot JFK. Whether he was a part of a conspiracy may very well be a question. However, the JFK conspiracy theorists seem to see shooters from all sides, e.g., the grassy knoll, when it is clear that no such thing happened.
Let's start with the indisputable fact that Oswald was the only shooter and move forward.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)He focussed on Oswald in order to find the truth. As he said, when one pitches a book to ones publisher about the JFK assassination, spends a couple of years on it and what one determines is that the Warren Commission basically got it right, that might not be the best strategy to take.
But Posner does get it right. He follows the forensic evidence which is indisputable. And he delves deeply into Oswald, and why he might have done this. Yup! Ruby's action does seem like a silencing. But then one has to connect Oswald with other influences. Posner's argument is that Oswald was the iconic loner, as has often been the assassin.
Plus, a lot of the JFK conspiracy arguments are based on falsified info.
Archae
(46,343 posts)The most notorious being the "magic bullet" theory, based on a drawing of a normal 1950's or 1960's 4-seat car.
Except the drawing is false.
Connoly was sitting in a removable "jump seat," which was lower than the back seat.
And from the Zapruder film itself, Kennedy's and Connoly's positions can be clearly seen, and the bullet path lines up.
And the bullet is not only not "magic" it's not "pristine."
It's flattened on the side, the way a bullet that was tumbling and hit sideways would do.
It does sound implausible, at first.
If someone said to me in 1976, that the President elected in 1980 would get shot and badly wounded by a nutcase, who had been in and out of mental hospitals, with a cheap pawnshop gun, I'd say that's crazy. It just couldn't happen.
But it did.
Just as in 1963 a loser who had grandiose visions of himself and hated Kennedy due to being a die-hard ultra-leftist, killed Kennedy.
Response to antigop (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed