...then he can raise money for the Democratic Party.
A great many of us give directly to candidates that WE support, because we know that if we give to the DNC, that said money would flow to the corporate conservadems that we DON'T support. And the conservadems will go on to lose the election anyway, because conservatives will vote for the real R over the fake R, and conservadems actively write off the Democratic base in a vain effort to appear "moderate."
Seriously, we've lost almost 1000 state legislative seats, and a whole lotta governorships and members of Congress, since DWS became DNC chair. She endorses Rs over Ds in the name of "comity." Can't have a D win in a district next to hers. And this is who Democrats trust to determine which candidates receive the financial support of the Democratic Party?
When we get someone who doesn't shill for payday loan sharks as head of the DNC, then we can talk about giving to the DNC again.
I get it. Establishment dems are butthurt that there's a serious outside challenger to the party fundraising structure. But unfortunately the party has compromised itself to the point where an outsider is needed to make the necessary changes to bring the party back to We the People.
= new reply since forum marked as read
