Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumLaw and order Bernie's solution on crack/cocaine sentencing disparity: INCREASE penalty for COCAINE!
The sentencing disparity on crack and cocaine means poor people are much more likely to be subject to mass incarceration.
Bernie's solution in 1994? Increase the penalties for cocaine users. Mass incarcerate crack AND cocaine users.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/04/12/when-bernie-sanders-conventional-politician-called-for-still-more-mass-incarceration.html
The story gets worse for Sanders. Over the weekend, an excerpt of remarks Congressman Sanders had inserted into the Congressional Record in 1995 started making the rounds. A debate was raging at the time about the crack-powder cocaine sentencing disparities (black people were more often arrested on crack charges, for which the sentencing guidelines were much harsher). The U.S. Sentencing Commission had recommended to Congress that it eliminate the disparity (PDF). It meant that Congress should do so by lowering the guidelines for crack so that theyd be equal to those for powder. Most Democrats, of course, supported this change.
Sanders? Well, he wanted to eliminate the disparitybut by raising the powder guidelines to those for crack! Here are the salient sentences, from the Record of Oct. 18, 1995, tweeted over the weekend by James E. Carter IV, President Carters grandson:
Well, Ill give him this much. The Sanders option would have eliminated the disparity. But it would have done so by throwing millions more people behind bars for years, ruining that many more lives, black, white, and otherwise. Its totally at odds with Sanderss rhetoric, which I agree with by the way, about how we need to give young people from difficult circumstances more opportunity. Bernie wanted to give young people from all circumstances less opportunity. He may never have used the word superpredators, but he sure seems to have believed in their existence.
Why was Sanders such a law-and-order type? Its hard to know, since of course he never talks about it and now says just the opposite, with all that imperious moral thunder that some find bewitching and others bothersome or bewildering. But this excellent Yahoo! News piece from early February lays the record out. He even voted against a bill in 1995 that would have established separate drug courts and taken steps to demilitarize police departments, preventing them from using any money in the act in question (which failed) for the purchase of Army-style tanks or aircraft.
VIDEO AT LINK