Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

mmonk

(52,589 posts) Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:49 PM Apr 2016

Revolution never come with a warning ...

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Revolution never come with a warning ... (Original Post) mmonk Apr 2016 OP

Actually, all revolutions come with multiple warnings Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2016 #1

Agreed. The powerful are too self-absorbed. mmonk Apr 2016 #2

"The Powerful are Too Self-Absorbed" ...and they never see it coming... KoKo Apr 2016 #4

Does that remind anyone of some Democrats? eom zalinda Apr 2016 #3

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,007 posts)

1. Actually, all revolutions come with multiple warnings

Reply to mmonk (Original post)

Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:54 PM

Apr 2016

It's just that the people who should be paying attention are too arrogant and isolated to heed the warnings or even notice.

Does that remind anyone of the Republicans?

mmonk

(52,589 posts)

2. Agreed. The powerful are too self-absorbed.

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #1)

Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:03 PM

Apr 2016

KoKo

(84,711 posts)

4. "The Powerful are Too Self-Absorbed" ...and they never see it coming...

Reply to mmonk (Reply #2)

Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:11 PM

Apr 2016

Crash of 1929...1987, 2000, 2008...and many in the World's History.

They never see it until it comes....except the "Smart Entitled Insiders" who manage to Bail Out and leave"The People" devastated to clean it up with the leavings to suffer through the Devastation, until the next Crash comes along.

zalinda

(5,621 posts)

3. Does that remind anyone of some Democrats? eom

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #1)

Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:32 PM

Apr 2016

Reply to this discussion