Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

Galraedia

(5,026 posts) Mon Jun 25, 2012, 10:01 PM Jun 2012

The ED Show - Rep. Issa contradicts Speaker Boehner

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The ED Show - Rep. Issa contradicts Speaker Boehner (Original Post) Galraedia Jun 2012 OP

I'm shocked Wallace asked that question... Grassy Knoll Jun 2012 #1

Contemptuous momsrule Jun 2012 #2

Ed, Ed, Ed. You missed the main point - THE SHRUB started the gun running in 2006!!! HopeHoops Jun 2012 #3

Issa has to take this position... Blue Meany Jun 2012 #4

Grassy Knoll

(10,118 posts)

1. I'm shocked Wallace asked that question...

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Mon Jun 25, 2012, 11:22 PM

Jun 2012

looks like johnny boner red was drunk again.

momsrule

(100 posts)

2. Contemptuous

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Tue Jun 26, 2012, 07:28 AM

Jun 2012

I only have contempt for Daryl Issa, John Boener,Mitch McConnel, Eric Cantor and the whole bunch of Republican party lemmings who have made a mockery of our democracy and vote in lock-step to prevent anything good from happening. It's as though they profit from doing so. Hmmmmn. Let's have a real investigation!

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)

3. Ed, Ed, Ed. You missed the main point - THE SHRUB started the gun running in 2006!!!

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Tue Jun 26, 2012, 11:08 AM

Jun 2012

Blue Meany

(1,947 posts)

4. Issa has to take this position...

Reply to Galraedia (Original post)

Tue Jun 26, 2012, 12:45 PM

Jun 2012

His argument is that the documents he asked for are not covered by Executive Privilege because the White House was not involved in the decisions. If he says that they are covering up their involvement, he undercuts his own argument.

Reply to this discussion