Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

MindMover

(5,016 posts) Mon Jul 9, 2012, 01:59 PM Jul 2012

Armstrong Sues to Block Doping Charges

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Armstrong Sues to Block Doping Charges (Original Post) MindMover Jul 2012 OP

Go get 'em Lance!!! truebrit71 Jul 2012 #1

The new drugs always beat the tests at the time. Exultant Democracy Jul 2012 #2

Another day, another lawsuit from Lance. Mika Jul 2012 #3

Which is way the grand jury indicted him...oh wait.. truebrit71 Jul 2012 #4

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)

1. Go get 'em Lance!!!

Reply to MindMover (Original post)

Mon Jul 9, 2012, 03:53 PM

Jul 2012

Over 500 tests, not one positive result, but they go after him anyway...bunch of wankers...

Exultant Democracy

(6,594 posts)

2. The new drugs always beat the tests at the time.

Reply to truebrit71 (Reply #1)

Mon Jul 9, 2012, 04:24 PM

Jul 2012

That is why going back and doing testing after the science catches up is so alarming to a lot of athletes that got away with it. Personally I think they should just move on, they will never fix the doping problem, all they are doing at this point is hurting the sport.

Mika

(17,751 posts)

3. Another day, another lawsuit from Lance.

Reply to MindMover (Original post)

Mon Jul 9, 2012, 05:03 PM

Jul 2012

There's plenty of evidence, and now retroactive blood and urine testing.
Lance is toast. Good riddance.

[hr]

| | | | |

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)

4. Which is way the grand jury indicted him...oh wait..

Reply to Mika (Reply #3)

Tue Jul 10, 2012, 10:09 AM

Jul 2012

The USADA should be toast, this is an exercise to justify their existence and their budget only...

Reply to this discussion