Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 2051 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachel Maddow - Romney not trustworthy after Massachusetts tax lie (Original Post)
Galraedia
Aug 2012
OP
So it would take 16666.666 years to amass 100 million dollars in an IRA. yup
Jumping John
Aug 2012
#1
Jumping John
(930 posts)1. So it would take 16666.666 years to amass 100 million dollars in an IRA. yup
spooky3
(34,484 posts)2. Rachel is outstanding, again. Do you know the date of this clip?
Galraedia
(5,027 posts)4. Aug 16, 2012
spooky3
(34,484 posts)5. thank you
mysuzuki2
(3,521 posts)3. I believe Rachel is wrong on one point.
I don't think there is any limit on how much you can put in an IRA. The limit applies only to how much of your contribution is tax free.
spooky3
(34,484 posts)6. According to the IRS, publication 590, there ARE contribution limits.
http://www.irs.gov/retirement/participant/article/0,,id=211358,00.html
"For 2011 and 2012, the maximum you can contribute to all of your traditional and Roth IRAs is the smaller of:
$5,000 ($6,000 if youre age 50 or older), or
your taxable compensation for the year."
Whether you may contribute and the deductibility of contributions depends on your income and other eligibility factors.
And, IRAs are NOT tax free. They are tax deferred in the case of traditional IRAs. Roth IRAs have mixed tax treatment.
I wonder if Romney was even eligible to contribute - did he have taxable compensation for the years he contributed, if most or all of his income was from dividends, etc.?
"For 2011 and 2012, the maximum you can contribute to all of your traditional and Roth IRAs is the smaller of:
$5,000 ($6,000 if youre age 50 or older), or
your taxable compensation for the year."
Whether you may contribute and the deductibility of contributions depends on your income and other eligibility factors.
And, IRAs are NOT tax free. They are tax deferred in the case of traditional IRAs. Roth IRAs have mixed tax treatment.
I wonder if Romney was even eligible to contribute - did he have taxable compensation for the years he contributed, if most or all of his income was from dividends, etc.?