Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumInAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)jrthin
(4,835 posts)pecosbob
(7,534 posts)instead of correcting their misuse of terms and restating the issue in clear, unambiguous language. Ms. Waters use of the term harass was of course intended to indicate non-violent shunning of these unprincipled, uncivilized people. The right wing media immediately chose to frame the term as a threat of violence. Schumer's acceptance of the term as such and failure to re-frame was a cardinal mistake in countering RW propaganda.
elleng
(130,825 posts)Thanks for stating it clearly, pecosbob.
Hence my concern about him as 'leader.'
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)elleng
(130,825 posts)They've ignored Professor Lakoff's lessons for many years.
https://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/10/27_lakoff.shtml
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Lakoff: Trump has turned words into weapons. And he's winning the linguistic war
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/13/how-to-report-trump-media-manipulation-language
George P Lakoff and Gil Duran
Wed 13 Jun 2018
Trump knows the press has a strong instinct to repeat his most outrageous claims, and this allows him put the press to work as a marketing agency for his ideas. His lies reach millions of people through constant repetition in the press and social media. This poses an existential threat to democracy.
Language works by activating brain structures called frame-circuits used to understand experience. They get stronger when we hear the activating language. Enough repetition can make them permanent, changing how we view the world.
Scientists, marketers, advertisers and salespeople understand these principles. So do Russian and Islamic State hackers. But most reporters and editors clearly dont. So the press is at a disadvantage when dealing with a super salesman with an instinctive ability to manipulate thought by 1) framing first 2) repeating often, and 3) leading others to repeat his words by getting people to attack him within his own frame.
calimary
(81,179 posts)I wish the DNC would put him on staff!!!
elleng
(130,825 posts)SADLY, they've ignored him.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)on the Republican side.
That said, Luntz gives out his talking points and Republicans know to repeat them in lock step. Democrats rarely follow their leadership in lock step like Republicans.
FM123
(10,053 posts)KPN
(15,641 posts)people for help with better messaging is just more of the same "marketing" focus thaqt Lakoff discussed critically in that interview.
democrank
(11,092 posts)We have let Republicans define us for years.
Bluepinky
(2,268 posts)Chuck Schumer is wrong to criticize her, and I applaud Hillary Clinton for her support. There is no policy more repulsive than separating children from their parents. Maxine gets this and Chuck doesnt.
The Wizard
(12,541 posts)and shouldn't be a Party leader. I'm a lifelong Democrat, but if leadership keeps capitulating to Republican feigned outrage and losing because of the perceived weakness, I'll become unaffiliated.
shanny
(6,709 posts)FakeNoose
(32,613 posts)sprinkleeninow
(20,235 posts)Better to have said NOTHING.
💙🇺🇸🌊
chesterslick
(33 posts)... to speak "truth to Power?"
And conversely, the compulsion to fight for what is "right" counter to prevailing public opinion...
No, their views here were wrong; but they were right to speak.
CrispyQ
(36,439 posts)That's the right message! Not the "play nice" message of Pelosi & Schumer.
Throughout the presidential campaign, Clinton was criticised for exercising a degree of emotional self-control that looked cold and inauthentic, while Trumps volatility was taken as evidence that he meant what he said and really cared. Lately, however, Democrats have been provoked to condemn the president with a passion some on the left warn is becoming uncivil. Im curious to know what Clinton thinks of this.
Oh, give me a break, she erupts, eyes widening into indignation. Give me a break! What is more uncivil and cruel than taking children away? It should be met with resolve and strength. And if some of that comes across as a little uncivil, well, childrens lives are at stake; their futures are at stake. That is that ridiculous concept of bothsideism."
I'm with both of them!
paleotn
(17,902 posts)appalachiablue
(41,113 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(21,105 posts)calimary
(81,179 posts)That title was made for someone like him. We need a firebrand. One of those back bench bomb throwers. The CONS got one with Newt Gingrich in 1980. Theyve been mowing us down ever since.
Guilded Lilly
(5,591 posts)fighting for us! Our freedom depends on warriors like Maxine.
Republicans get away with shit because no one wants to approach their stinking bathroom.
Time to flush them out and send them to the sewers where they belong.
maxrandb
(15,313 posts)With these asspickles.
I'm sure if it were his kids being kidnapped he'd want to be civil to the kidnappers.
elmac
(4,642 posts)they are helping putin overthrow this country, they just don't have what it takes to represent us.
msongs
(67,381 posts)Dorn
(523 posts)I am disappointed that he did exactly what I expected.
KPN
(15,641 posts)effectively what he did. He either needs to start throwing hard punches, no offensive bombs daily and more like Trump does with his tweets, or step aside and let someone who can actually lead from an offensive as opposed to a defensive posture do it.
I'll give Pelosi another chance. She shouldn't have criticized Maxine -- that was a ridiculous mistake in the face of the uncivil and uncivilized Trump and his GOP criminal pals. But she can also be tough and I like her generally. Schumer has always struck me as a pushover.
paleotn
(17,902 posts)shit when he told his fellow Dem Senators not to celebrate when John McCain went thumbs down on the ACA repeal. I called bullshit then and I'm calling it now. The Dems should have rubbed it in McTurtle's face. Forget civility. Schumer needs to realize you cannot work with McConnell and his cast of clowns. Thus, nothing is lost by calling them what they are and celebrating when the lose.
Hekate
(90,617 posts)NBachers
(17,096 posts)Chuck almost always lives down to them.
lapucelle
(18,231 posts)unity, civility, or who defended a person's right to have dinner in a restaurant in peace actually mention Maxine by name?
Who besides Maxine rejected the framing of the narrative as a question of civility?
NRaleighLiberal
(60,013 posts)TryLogic
(1,722 posts)He reads his statements trying to sound like he cares, but it comes across as him pretending to care. I think I will just ID him as Chuck the Wimp.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,168 posts)wow. We need new leadership...like immediately.
And that seems close to the truth. Protecting his leadership status by dampening down the threat level, afraid of Fox News portraying him as an extremist. Pelosi and Schumer are living in a bubble from the 90's. Wake up, this is all happening now! They are so damn afraid of their own base getting too riled up because it will look 'bad' on them. Two of the biggest frogs in the pot admonishing the others in there with them to shush about the increasing temperature of the water.
Republicans fire up their base with lies, and their base fires up the normally moderates, which gives 'courage' to their representatives to keep pushing right.
But the Democratic leadership is to hopelessly hesitant to take the same winning strategy, EVEN THOUGH THEY DON'T HAVE TO USE LIES!. Partly due to many establishment Dems beholden to the same corporations and donors as the ones getting the big tax breaks from the latest tax scam bill so they don't want to ruffle too many feathers. And partly because the establishment Dems don't want to be upstaged by what they define as leftist Dems. Meanwhile the Trumpists are putting down deep roots.
"Yes, there are two paths you can go by
But in the long run
There's still time to change the road you're on"
KelleyKramer
(8,946 posts)In 35 years of following politics I don't think I have seen a more in-competent leader of the Dems in the senate
The guy just sucks... no political savvy, no courage, no clue about opposing legislation, and is even worse on messaging.. a total disaster
We need somebody else to lead senate Dems, somebody, ANYBODY would be better
Damn, I miss Harry Reid