Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumKellyanne Conway's interview tricks, explained
I found this by accident, it's from over a year ago but I think it is still very relevant ...
Kellyanne Conway's interview tricks, explained
Kellyanne Conway has a supernatural ability to derail any interview that paints Donald Trump in a negative light. How does she do it?
.
SergeStorms
(19,201 posts)KelleyKramer
(8,961 posts)She does it all the time, like in the video she uses the interviewers politeness to get away with it
joet67
(624 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)The rest of the news media and talk shows should do likewise. She can't be a spokesperson for Trump if nobody will have her come on their shows.
See how easy that is?
KPN
(15,645 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)You would think she'd pass out from lack of oxygen.
tomhagen
(3,604 posts)Cmon Media; you and your viewers have nothing to learn from her
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)They would have nothing to complain about if they did that and filling that Breathless 24/7 Infotainment Cycle takes some noise between the ads for Big Pharma.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)her lying arse.
yonder
(9,666 posts)I got a good chuckle at the 5:10 mark when the narrator guy looks to the next screen on his left and jumps back.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)One thing he didn't talk about, was that she is also getting through important talking points, usually lies, that Trump and the Republicans want disseminated. She'll answer a question about Trump's bad behavior with some alternative 'fact' about how the Democrats/Obama/Hillary have screwed something up. Or brag about Trump's accomplishment in the economy (that Obama re-built).
What it does is leaves you, a Democrat, with a raging headache. But what it leaves any Republicans watching, or undecided fence sitters, is those talking points branded into their brains. She usually leaves any interview winning, because she understands her one job there is NOT to answer any question, at least in the way they want her to, but to shore up any Trump doubters with alternative facts and reaffirmations of Democrats deceitfulness. She ends with a smile and wink and looking smug and winning, while the pundit looks confused and disheveled. And optically, some would assume that she pwned the pundit......thus all what she said was probably on the money.