Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumTake Away AD HOMINEM, And Republicans Got NOTHING. That's Why Their Heads Are Exploding.
Notice how Republican heads are exploding over the identity of the whistleblower, instead of dealing with the EVIDENCE?
That's because the goddamned evidence the whistleblower gave us is CORRECT! And if you can't argue the evidence, ATTACK THE MESSENGER.
But you CAN'T trash and destroy the messenger if you don't know who it is! That's what's driving them crazy, and I'm LOVING it!
Mark Levin ('The Loud One') accidentally blurts out his true motivations at the 4:40 mark.
"I wanna know all about him! I wanna know what kinda DOGS they have! How many marriages they've had! If they had a D.U.I.! I wanna know if they're partisan! I wanna know EVERYTHING!"
Damned right you do, dickhead. So you can begin trashing every aspect of their life, instead of having to talk about the EVIDENCE and the FACTS. Well...not this time, shithead. The whistleblower's identity is protected by law, and for a damned good reason.
(Sorry for the source, but I didn't want to send you to the Fox News website. So, this video is from some bozo Trump supporter.)
B Stieg
(2,410 posts)And the rhetoric they use is metastasis or "tu quoque!"
Aussie105
(5,214 posts)Hey! Maybe we can march an actor into the studio, and say 'This is the whistleblower!' and see what happens?
Then announce 'This is a paid actor!'
Watch them dig a deep hole for themselves!
Grokenstein
(5,707 posts)...but if the whistleblower has had a divorce, that means...something?
Go to Hell, Levin. And bring me back a present.
stopbush
(24,378 posts)I wanna know if they paid porn stars for sex! I wanna know if they scammed building contractors! I wanna know if they colluded with Russia to win an election! I wanna know if they had to pay a $25-million settlement for running a fake university!
Oops...wait...er
usaf-vet
(6,094 posts)Bromwell
(123 posts)Is this what passes for right wing political analysis....a screaming raving moron?
ffr
(22,649 posts)Any argument that results in one person diverting to an Ad Hominem has lost the argument by their own admission. They cannot stay on point to back up their claim and therefore they have to resort to insults and character assassination.
Show me a Fox viewer and I'll show you a drone that has no idea of how to form a logical defensible argument.
K&R
Cartaphelius
(868 posts)respect to one that witnessed your fellow repukes, attacked Clinton for lying a blow job
for completely partisan reasons.
Maybe because he did something repukes never have done or ever would, paid down a National Debt,
advancing this nations prosperity.