Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump: Deer In The Headlights (Original Post) DinahMoeHum Jun 2020 OP
Thank You for posting...K and R Stuart G Jun 2020 #1
"Too weak to lead." That's the money quote! nt procon Jun 2020 #2
That cuts to the bone. ffr Jun 2020 #3
Excellent from visuals to text to tone. SharonClark Jun 2020 #4
Wondered how effective the Dem attack ads are. Found nothing direct. This older study interesting. empedocles Jun 2020 #5
Deer in the Headlights magicguido Jun 2020 #6
Excellent! Nitram Jun 2020 #7

SharonClark

(10,014 posts)
4. Excellent from visuals to text to tone.
Fri Jun 12, 2020, 11:17 AM
Jun 2020

And it's believable because every American has seen him being weak and afraid.

Wouldn't it be bizarre that he "won" in 2016 by being a bully and he'll lose in 2020 by being a coward.

empedocles

(15,751 posts)
5. Wondered how effective the Dem attack ads are. Found nothing direct. This older study interesting.
Fri Jun 12, 2020, 11:42 AM
Jun 2020

''Why attack ads work

If you’re sick of all those negative political ads that run on television before Election Day, well, you’re out of luck. Those ads—which many people say they hate—run for a reason: They work.
So says Joan Phillips, a Quinlan professor of marketing who has researched how voters react to negative political ads. But if so many people say they can’t stand the ads, why are they so effective?
It’s the same reason why people are more likely to watch the weather when a hurricane is coming than when it’s sunny and 70 degrees outside, Phillips says.
“We pay more attention to negative information,” she says. “It’s more salient, it scares us, and we’re more likely to remember it.”
. . .

in a tightly contested race, like this year’s presidential election, getting even a few people to change their vote can make all the difference in the world.
“That’s a huge, huge gain for a candidate,” Phillips says.
Negative ads tend to work best when people are passionate about the campaign, such as a presidential election where the stakes are high, Phillips says. . . .
So what’s the bottom line?
“We’re not saying positive ads aren’t good,” Phillips says. “It’s just that negative ads are effective.”

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Trump: Deer In The Headl...