Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumCNN Reporter vs Arizona Senate President Over Election Audit - NowThis News
Maricopa County is on its THIRD audit of the 2020 presidential ballots so this CNN reporter tracked down Arizona's GOP Senate president to get some answers.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1193 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNN Reporter vs Arizona Senate President Over Election Audit - NowThis News (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
May 2021
OP
And that this obviously well informed and experienced reporter wouldn't know??
Rhiannon12866
May 2021
#4
Skittles
(153,169 posts)1. you don't think OAN is credible
OMFG
Rhiannon12866
(205,524 posts)2. I know!
I cringed...
Skittles
(153,169 posts)3. it's like they assume everyone is as stupid and racist as they are
truly mind-boggling
Rhiannon12866
(205,524 posts)4. And that this obviously well informed and experienced reporter wouldn't know??
Or would answer otherwise.
Merlot
(9,696 posts)5. The reporter really didn't do much good here.
CapnSteve
(219 posts)6. It is very misleading to use "no widespread voter fraud..."
Those of us with brains can make the leap to what that means - not enough fraud to overturn the election. But, it implies that there was significant voter fraud.
Folks the reality is every study. Every. Study. Shows voter fraud rates less than 0.0025%.
So when the GOP meat puppet asked: "Are you 100% certain that there was no (insert list of wackadoodle voting conspiracy theories here!)?" She should have answered: "No, I am 99.9975% certain, based on the billion ballots audited over the last two decades."
99.9975%