Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumTexas Judge Temporarily Blocks Restrictive Law Against Planned Parenthood - MSNBC
Elie Mystal and Amy Hagstrom Miller join Tiffany Cross to discuss the latest on Texas draconian abortion ban, and what the Biden Administration and Department of Justice can do to circumvent it. Aired on 09/04/2021.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 855 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas Judge Temporarily Blocks Restrictive Law Against Planned Parenthood - MSNBC (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
Sep 2021
OP
This is the same judge who is handling the Alex Jones cases in Travis County
LetMyPeopleVote
Sep 2021
#3
Another deplorable who thinks he's above the law. He deserves to be removed from the air.
Rhiannon12866
Sep 2021
#6
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)1. Good!
sheshe2
(83,654 posts)2. K&R
LetMyPeopleVote
(144,919 posts)3. This is the same judge who is handling the Alex Jones cases in Travis County
Juanita Jean's son, Mark Bankston, is the lead plaintiff attorney in that case and I listened to a hearing on Tuesday discussing sanction and possible default judgments
Link to tweet
Rhiannon12866
(204,746 posts)4. Important news, thanks for posting!
LetMyPeopleVote
(144,919 posts)5. Juanita Jean had sent me the link to watch the Tuesday hearing
I got to watch part of the hearing and judge was not happy with with Jones and his current attorney and hinted that another attorney would not be likely to be admitted. Susan Bankston got to watch the entire hearing and she was pleased
https://www.statesman.com/story/news/2021/09/01/sandy-hook-parents-texas-judge-sanction-alex-jones-infowars/5662371001/
On Tuesday, their lawyer appeared before state District Judge Maya Guerra Gamble in Austin to argue that Jones must be sanctioned for violating rules on pretrial discovery, as well as previous court orders, by withholding vital information that was first requested in 2018.
"We still don't have the most basic information about this case," lawyer Mark Bankston told the judge, arguing that Jones has failed to provide a wide range of requested evidence, including video of his on-air discussions about Sandy Hook, relevant transcripts and the content of social media accounts.......
Because the pattern of abuse was so egregious, Bankston argued, the parents should be able to skip next year's trials on whether Jones defamed them and proceed directly to determining how much money they're owed in damages.
Bankston also asked the judge to find Jones in contempt of court for violating previous orders to provide the requested information.
"We still don't have the most basic information about this case," lawyer Mark Bankston told the judge, arguing that Jones has failed to provide a wide range of requested evidence, including video of his on-air discussions about Sandy Hook, relevant transcripts and the content of social media accounts.......
Because the pattern of abuse was so egregious, Bankston argued, the parents should be able to skip next year's trials on whether Jones defamed them and proceed directly to determining how much money they're owed in damages.
Bankston also asked the judge to find Jones in contempt of court for violating previous orders to provide the requested information.
Rhiannon12866
(204,746 posts)6. Another deplorable who thinks he's above the law. He deserves to be removed from the air.