Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ItsjustMe

(11,232 posts)
Sat Dec 25, 2021, 12:17 PM Dec 2021

Small Technicality May Let Trump And His Friends Get Away With Sedition - Farron Balanced

The law is a fickle thing here in America, and sometimes a single word or phrase can make the difference between an acquittal and a conviction. And legal experts are now saying that this kind of technicality could allow Trump and his buddies to get away with sedition, assuming they are even charged in the first place. Farron Cousins discusses this technicality and what it could mean for the investigation.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

empedocles

(15,751 posts)
2. Dave Barry notes in his Year in Review, that 'the media, performing their vital,
Sat Dec 25, 2021, 12:27 PM
Dec 2021

constitutionally protected function of terrifying the public' . . .



Escurumbele

(3,396 posts)
3. I did not watch the entire video...When I hear it from Neal Katyal, or one of the other top lawyer
Sat Dec 25, 2021, 12:28 PM
Dec 2021

I will believe it.

usaf-vet

(6,189 posts)
4. Hey I've got a better idea than televising these "technicalities". Rather than broadcast the info...
Sat Dec 25, 2021, 12:57 PM
Dec 2021

..... why don't you just email the attornies and suspects with how they can avoid jail.

The 1/6 commission is doing all they can to keep information compartmentalized from each person that testifies so they CAN'T all share a legal strategy.

Try balancing the info you feel you have to "be the first to report" with the NEED for Americans to expect punishment.

Justice matters.

(6,935 posts)
5. The President, from his Oath of Office on, has an obligation...
Sat Dec 25, 2021, 02:44 PM
Dec 2021

Article II of the U.S. Constitution twice imposes a duty of faithful execution on the President, who must “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” and take an oath or affirmation to “faithfully execute the Office of President.”

The committee believes that, after he said "peacefully" (then "fight like hell" which is a contradiction), as soon as he saw his cultists ransack the Capitol (not "peacefully"...) it was his duty to communicate to them, by a tweet or otherwise, to stop the lawless violence at the very least.

He didn't do it for 187 minutes. Instead, he issued a tweet about Pence refusing to throw away the votes, which incited his cultists to chant "hang mike pence" while continuing their lawless acts.

That's why the committee wants to access the National Archives domuments: To get specific evidence of what the orange terrorist was doing instead of his presidential duty (to take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed) for 3 hours and 7 minutes.

U.S. Code Title 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1505
18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees
U.S. Code

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 770; Pub. L. 87–664, § 6(a), Sept. 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 551; Pub. L. 91–452, title IX, § 903, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 947; Pub. L. 94–435, title I, § 105, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1389; Pub. L. 97–291, § 4(d), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1253; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6703(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3766.)

Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1505


So, whether he believed the election was stolen (which he didn't, really), he's guilty of not doing his job, resulting in charges of obstruction of congressional proceedings.

Ohioboy

(3,243 posts)
6. Make them claim there was fraud under oath
Sat Dec 25, 2021, 07:57 PM
Dec 2021

If any of these democracy killing turds think they were doing the right thing they should be proud to stand up. Otherwise, they are just hiding from their crimes.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Small Technicality May Le...