Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumRepublican Senator HUMILIATES herself with unreal question at Supreme Court hearing - Brian Tyler Co
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1849 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (22)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republican Senator HUMILIATES herself with unreal question at Supreme Court hearing - Brian Tyler Co (Original Post)
ItsjustMe
Mar 2022
OP
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)1. Well lets not forget this.....
https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2021/1/blackburn-hagerty-and-colleagues-will-vote-to-oppose-electoral-college-results
and then her and her other person did this.....
https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/06/marsha-blackburn-bill-hagerty-electoral-college-joe-biden-win-donald-trump/6576547002/
and you sit on the judiciary committee you should be expelled.......
and then her and her other person did this.....
https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/06/marsha-blackburn-bill-hagerty-electoral-college-joe-biden-win-donald-trump/6576547002/
and you sit on the judiciary committee you should be expelled.......
peppertree
(21,624 posts)4. Or Corny's "Taliban" dig
He had the temerity to ask why Jackson had called Bush and Rumsfeld war criminals while (gasp!) representing a Taliban defendant.
Because a) this is America, and even Charles Manson is entitled to a proper legal defense;
And b) because they were, you thieving shitkicker.
Escurumbele
(3,389 posts)2. I wanted to hear the answer. Brian has bad timing, he always does this, cuts the video at the wrong
moment, and then talks too much. I like the guy, but on this videos I tend to pass them because of that.
rickford66
(5,523 posts)5. She was relating how she would ask on Tuesday.
Jackson couldn't answer.
intheflow
(28,462 posts)3. NOT true that CRT only exists in law school!
Where'd this dude get that idea? I was first exposed to it in my undergraduate Peace Studies program in the late 1990s, then again in seminary in the early 2000s for my MDiv, and again in library school for my MLS five years ago. Yes!! I have never formally studied law and yet I've been taught CRT at universities and grad school across the country for longer than this yahoo has been alive. I mean, he's on the right track, no need to derail the argument with straight-up ignorance.
Personally, I'm of the mind that Anti-Racist Baby should be required curriculum in every state and federally funded preschool and kindergarten in the country, and CRT deeply entrenched in our elementary and primary schools along with the 1619 Project. The "but it only happens in law school" argument ultimately throws the good people teaching CRT outside of law classrooms under the bus. At best, the argument ignores and undermines their work. At worst, it sets them out to fend for themselves when the GQP's kids come home from college and report it's actually being taught as a cross-discipline concept.
Personally, I'm of the mind that Anti-Racist Baby should be required curriculum in every state and federally funded preschool and kindergarten in the country, and CRT deeply entrenched in our elementary and primary schools along with the 1619 Project. The "but it only happens in law school" argument ultimately throws the good people teaching CRT outside of law classrooms under the bus. At best, the argument ignores and undermines their work. At worst, it sets them out to fend for themselves when the GQP's kids come home from college and report it's actually being taught as a cross-discipline concept.