There's a data and legal rebuttal Democrats can make for every statement this asshole makes.

[ancianita]

Pure protection racket theater. Probably Swalwell was the only one of the majority Democrats to make any rebuttal to his bullshit city comparisons and his claims of "they gonna take away our guns!" The rest couldn't offer any studies or statistics to refute him.

[TeamProg]

1. Woe Jerrold Nadler, his heart is in the right place but he's just not quick on his feet. He should

have immediately given himself time as Chairman to make some points.

He should have asked Steube "How much in campaign donations has the NRA paid to you since you've been in Congress?"

Nadler should have said that "During the Congressman's time, notice that he displayed firearms not unlike these crazy Taliban leaders or other known foreign terrorist group leaders."

Nadler should have said "The Congressman appears far more upset that his personal firearm collection will be banned than his desire to keep our school kids safe and to keep dangerous weapons of war our of an 18 year old's hands"


Nadler should have said "Facts show that states with the least restrictive gun laws have the highest gun deaths per-capita".

We love ya Jerry, but man, maybe it's time to hand over the reigns.

[ancianita]

3. See what you did?

His aides could have had all those fast facts right in front of him.

[TeamProg]

4. I'm a civilian and know that stuff off the top of my head. A Congressman, a CHAIRMAN of committees

should know all that and more without having to rely on his aides.

[ancianita]

6. I hear you. But you nailed it, regardless.

[magicguido]

2. BYPASS the USELESS republicans. Executive Actions by the President. HARDBALL

[dweller]

5. How the fuk

did he get that onto the floor of Congress?

nm… he called it in



✌🏻

[ancianita]

7. He was in committee, not on the floor. Not there at all. He did his theater from home.