Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(205,467 posts)
Fri Jun 3, 2022, 05:12 PM Jun 2022

Trump aide Peter Navarro indicted for contempt of Congress; what's next for defendant Navarro?




Peter Navarro, aide to former president Donald Trump, defied a congressional subpoena seeking information about Trump's involvement in the insurrection and other efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. On April 6, Congress voted Navarro in contempt and referred him to the Department of Justice for prosecution.

Thereafter, the Department of Justice subpoenaed Navarro to appear before the grand jury. Navarro was scheduled to appear yesterday, June 2. But today, June 3, a grand jury indictment was unsealed charging Navarro with two counts of contempt of Congress.

Here is a discussion of the timing of today's charges and what is likely in store for Peter Navarro. - Glenn Kirschner 06/03/2022.



6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump aide Peter Navarro indicted for contempt of Congress; what's next for defendant Navarro? (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Jun 2022 OP
DOJ is now working it's way up the Food Chain magicguido Jun 2022 #1
It's a shame that they didn't indict Meadows or Scavino, TexasTowelie Jun 2022 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Rhiannon12866 Jun 2022 #3
Check out Kirschner's offering for today, he explains the likely plan: Rhiannon12866 Jun 2022 #4
I just watched it. TexasTowelie Jun 2022 #5
Thanks for the background, I've wondered, too. Rhiannon12866 Jun 2022 #6

TexasTowelie

(112,236 posts)
2. It's a shame that they didn't indict Meadows or Scavino,
Sat Jun 4, 2022, 07:10 PM
Jun 2022

but I'll remain an optimist that they will be charged with more serious crimes soon.

Response to TexasTowelie (Reply #2)

Rhiannon12866

(205,467 posts)
4. Check out Kirschner's offering for today, he explains the likely plan:
Sat Jun 4, 2022, 08:50 PM
Jun 2022


DOJ Indicts Navarro & Bannon but not Meadows & Scavino. Here are three possible explanations why.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1017740506

TexasTowelie

(112,236 posts)
5. I just watched it.
Sat Jun 4, 2022, 09:23 PM
Jun 2022

Perhaps the prosecutors at DOJ were able to persuade Meadows and Scavino to be cooperating witnesses and it would make sense because Meadows did cooperate initially with the J6 investigation. I've been more patient than most members on DU regarding the pace that the DOJ is working on this overall assignment. Fortunately, my background as a state employee and in IT provided me with some guesses for how long some portions of the task might take. Gathering the evidence in the multitude of formats it existed and building the relational databases for record keeping probably required a few weeks before data was entered into them and new records continue to be added with each prosecution.

Rhiannon12866

(205,467 posts)
6. Thanks for the background, I've wondered, too.
Sat Jun 4, 2022, 09:32 PM
Jun 2022

But it does make sense that it would take time, this was a complicated plot and there were so many involved - and the Committee - and DOJ - need to do it right. And it does make sense that they'd hope for cooperating witnesses. The ultimate goal is to build an unassailable case against those who orchestrated and led this attempted overthrow of the government - and would have benefited most if it succeeded.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Trump aide Peter Navarro ...