Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumJamie Raskin HUMILIATES Republican at hearing, gets OVATION - Brian Tyler Cohen
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1248 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jamie Raskin HUMILIATES Republican at hearing, gets OVATION - Brian Tyler Cohen (Original Post)
ItsjustMe
Jul 2022
OP
I sometimes think that Raskin has all of the Right Stuff to lead the executive.
Chainfire
Jul 2022
#1
Chainfire
(17,647 posts)1. I sometimes think that Raskin has all of the Right Stuff to lead the executive.
ancianita
(36,137 posts)2. THE constitutional scholar of Congress eats yet another Republican's lunch.
Faux pas
(14,694 posts)3. Kickety Kickin'
Martin68
(22,892 posts)4. Brilliant! I have never heard a better argument against the NRA's misreading of the 2nd
Amendment. We need to hear more about the absolute unconstitutionality of the "guns rights" movement, which makes a totally bogus interpretation of the Constitution to defend the NRA's absurd contention that we need to arm every citizen to fight our own government. The clause regarding "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State" was designed to allow the creation of militias to DEFEND the U.S. government against insurrection.
madaboutharry
(40,224 posts)5. These retrograde dumbasses should know better
than to tell a Constitutional law professor and scholar what anything in The Constitution means.
I ❤️ Jamie Raskin and his low tolerance for bullshit.