Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumBREAKING: NY Democrat Pat Ryan SHOCKS with election win for Congress DEFYING POLLS - Meidas Touch
Democratic candidate for Congress Pat Ryan is confirmed as the winner for the open seat election in New Yorks 19th Congressional District. Every poll had his Republican opponent Marc Molinaro leading before todays election. One of the decisive issues Pat Ryan ran on was protecting a womens right to choose.
PortTack
(32,771 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,423 posts)The Republicans/SCOTUS went too far and the voters are reacting. Kansas was not an aberration.
elias7
(4,006 posts)PortTack
(32,771 posts)Its either as you said, or the pollsters have lost their edge or some of both
Roy Rolling
(6,917 posts)The political issue isnt abortion, its women. Hiding behind calling it a medical procedure dehumanizes the process
for the mother.
It shouldnt be a shock that people love their mothers and all women more than political hacks passing morality laws to hide their political weakness.
Republican men and women are gobsmakacked by the election results, Democrats not so much. We dont hide behind paeudo-medical science to exploit women.
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,053 posts)that was vacated after the (D) became Lt. Governor, and the area voted for Biden in 2020, yet instead chose to manufacture ridiculous percentages predicting an (R) win.
Thankfully some of the media are calling this a "bellweather" race.
Congrats to Pat Ryan!
Claustrum
(4,845 posts)It voted for Obama in 2012 too.
BumRushDaShow
(129,053 posts)and the parts of it that were NY-19 before the redistricting in 2012 voted for Obama too in 2008.
Yet a choice was made to over-emphasize a freak 45 win to assume that a (R) was going to get it hands down despite the district voting for Biden in 2020 (and all or part voting for Obama twice), and goes to show the complete bullshit of who they thought were "likely voters", vs the reality.
Down here with PA-1, which is just outside of Philly, is where you see a truer "swing district", where "well known" (locally) moderate (R)s have been elected for the most part (with a (D) getting the seat during the 2006 wave and as part of the 2008 Obama coattails, but losing in 2010) despite (D) Presidential majority votes from such a district.
Claustrum
(4,845 posts)win for them. So the MSM hyped it. Instead, it showed democrats being more willing to vote than republicans.
BumRushDaShow
(129,053 posts)where Deminpenn mentioned the potential issue with assuming who the "likely voters" were going to be - at least based on past precedent for mid-years the first term of a new party. I.e., looking at the "approval" ratings of that party's President, and the issues that they keep trying to pound on like "inflation!!1!!!1111!" and "high gas prices!!1!!!!111!" that have started to come down (yet I am now hearing cherry-picked anecdotes reported as "news" by those outlets about what consumers "are paying" ), and thus they assumed that Democrats would lay down and take the beating and relent.
Despite what was in their faces, they really really underestimated the overturn of Roe v. Wade - which unless something is passed federally to codify it, it is PERMANENT, which makes those stakes much higher. Yet "inflation" and the economy have always been "transitory" conditions.
In essence they woke a sleeping giant - and we really need to show that no, we are NOT asleep. And it needs to happen in the state legislatures as well because that is who will control our lives when the SCOTUS starts revoking rights.
Claustrum
(4,845 posts)As much as we hate it, he did awaken some rural uneducated white voters to vote for him. And the reasonable, more educated people came over to our party. We've seen it in 2018 where when TFG wasn't on the ballot, their voter don't show up. That used to happen on the democratic side where our voters don't show up in midterms. It will take more years to see if that assumption holds but it means that the old "likely voters" model is likely no longer viable.
BumRushDaShow
(129,053 posts)although now, the pandemic has taken out quite a few of them since 2020.
But after years of people hearing over and over that "Roe is 'established law'" and then finding out it wasn't, I think (and am hoping it pans out) that the whole younger demographic who it will impact, who talk a good game but don't show up to actually vote, will finally become at least some "larger" portion of "likely voters" as a part of what happened this past June.
Many of them were out there at BLM protests and the fact that you saw the result of that KS referendum, with quite a bit of cross-over vote, you are going to have an election of split votes and "under votes" (not voting for all of the candidates on the ballot). And when that happens, the polls can't possibly capture such a phenomena.
blue-wave
(4,356 posts)RocRizzo55
(980 posts)I know them both. Glad to see that Pat won. I really cannot stand little Marcs cloyingly sweet talk. Marc already tried and lost a gubernatorial race. I bet he tries again. Little Marc just wants to get his name out so that he can eventually run for president. I know Marc better, because I retired from Dutchess County government several years ago, and have had many run ins with him. Nice to your face, but will stab you in the back given the chance.
Yes, the area is quite Republicon leaning, but the district has had Dems before. The last rep was a Dem, as was the local icon, Maurice Hinchey. Boy, do I miss Mo. He was a real friend, and a great representative for WE THE PEOPLE in Congress. I hope that Pat can do half as good a job as Hinchey did.
underpants
(182,823 posts)160,000 posts.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10181698910