Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumNEW: Incriminating Texts INTRODUCED at Oath Keepers Seditious Conspiracy Federal Trial - Meidas Touch
During the third week of the Oath Keepers Seditious Conspiracy Trial, Federal Prosecutors introduced bombshell text messages showing the plan of this terrorist organization with or without Trumps support.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1245 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NEW: Incriminating Texts INTRODUCED at Oath Keepers Seditious Conspiracy Federal Trial - Meidas Touch (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
Oct 2022
OP
Oh, I couldn't agree more, he's really good, armed with the facts and doesn't mince words
Rhiannon12866
Oct 2022
#2
KS Toronado
(17,243 posts)1. Lot of what he said should be in our TV ads
Like 1:20 to 2:00 minute mark.
Rhiannon12866
(205,405 posts)2. Oh, I couldn't agree more, he's really good, armed with the facts and doesn't mince words
He also has a legal background and that helps. Most Americans aren't following these trials like he is.
Chainfire
(17,542 posts)3. It will be very interesting to see how the jury reacts to the Offal Keepers.
stopdiggin
(11,312 posts)4. 'with or without support'
Ohhhh. - Not sure I like the sound of that.
Might well be true - but I hate seeing any cover thrown Trump's way.
I want any overt violence on Jan6th, and any plans or planning for such - as closely tied to Trump and his inner circle as possible. (might not in the end prove possible - I've also heard that OKpers had become frustrated with Ts 'namby-pamby' course - but words such as this don't help)