Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumRape Wasn't Rape Because Victim Wasn't Married
From: www.davidpakman.com
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1396 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rape Wasn't Rape Because Victim Wasn't Married (Original Post)
celtics23
Jan 2013
OP
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)1. Good grief that is ridiculous!
Some of these old laws are asinine and need to go! That pisses me off to no end. Where is the justice here?
siligut
(12,272 posts)2. In Utah, because I wasn't married I was considered fair game
I have told this story before. Utah is so backward when it comes to women's rights. I believe this attitude is taken to encourage women to marry, because you know, it will keep them safe and out of trouble.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)3. Sounds like rape is being defined as a property crime. If a woman isn't owed by her husband, it's
finders keepers.
jamejest
(37 posts)4. Pay for your SIN!
I see in this a link to premarital sex. Since the woman(evil) agreed to have sex outside of wedlock with a man(good) she is not entitled to
protection of the law.
WhoIsNumberNone
(7,875 posts)5. I'd be interested to know who appointed those judges
Statistically it's pretty likely they were appointed by a Republican. For quite some time it's been their strategy to stack the courts with right wing freaks, and to sandbag judicial appointments by Democrats. And the result is you get rulings like this.