Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumNRA put out a second ad yesterday mentioning the kid's schools of Obama AND David Gregory
I haven't heard anything on the news about this ad yet.
What the hell is the matter with these nuts !!!
calimary
(81,421 posts)to fight with! 2014 will be here before you know it!!!
madashelltoo
(1,698 posts)it stops nothing. We have had officers and metal detectors in our schools for years. Still, there have shootings and stabbings inside our schools here in Philadelphia. To arm more people only increases the possibility of one them losing it and shooting the place up. Wake up, people. Track the guns and the unstable.
elleng
(131,056 posts)Didn't Chelsea attend Sidwell???
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)elleng
(131,056 posts)Some friends' kids attended. Not everyone 'well off,' but most are.
Quaker origin: Sidwell Friends School
greatauntoftriplets
(175,748 posts)mt_big_blue_sky
(15 posts)We should have armed guards everywhere, right? or am I missing something.....? Mall shooting? Armed guards. Movie theater? Armed guards. Restaurants? Armed guards. More guns. Neighborhoods? Armed guards. More guns.
I am not looking at this as a slippery slope argument here. There's no speculation or bogeyman.
This is their argument:
"If only there were a gun in that ____________ (insert location here) this wouldn't have happened."
What shooting related circumstance or location would not get this answer from these people?!
What would the USA look like if this WAS the answer for all the gun killings?
This is their answer. The NRA solution is... Armed guards.
This is pretty sick stuff.
BainsBane
(53,041 posts)They are allied with a group Fomenting assassination of the first family.
Darkhawk32
(2,100 posts)Do I want guns in school? Fucking hell fucking no!
I like to target shoot, that's it.
Please don't be as extreme as the NRA.
BainsBane
(53,041 posts)Do you oppose the President's proposed changes to gun law? If not, you have no reason to take offense. If you do . . .well, I can't say what you would deserve without violating TOS.
If you have spent more that a couple of minutes on this site or reading the newspaper in the past month, you would know gun owners are not the problem. Most gun owners support restrictions like an assault weapons ban, but if you prefer to identify with the lunatic right, that is your choice.
Response to BainsBane (Reply #9)
Post removed
BainsBane
(53,041 posts)I made quite clear my post was not directed against gun openers but gunners--a term used here on DU to describe those who opposes any increased restrictions on guns. If that describes you, I am the least of your problems.
BainsBane
(53,041 posts)Gun nuts by using the term gunners instead. I'll default back to the more accurate terminology.
doc03
(35,361 posts)like him now the Repthugs don't either?
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)when he showed that illegal magazine. I think that is the only reason he got in trouble for showing the magazine too. They were punishing him for speaking out against the repuke meme.
doc03
(35,361 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)How many armed guards will we need in each classroom? Remember, a half dozen armed and trained Secret Service Agents and D.C. policemen standing within ten feet of Ronald Reagan could not prevent him being shot and nearly killed by a deranged, lone assassin with a single hand gun.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)And even then, some can get through
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Yes, some do. One is usually enough.
Armed guards in schools are simply not a panacea.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)and the worst of the bullies.
The concept is if you make something a harder target, the bad guys will go elsewhere. While it has some validity, it clearly does not always work. I can see better structural features, but armed guards are not a viable solution for me.
BainsBane
(53,041 posts)More guns, more dead children. But most importantly more gun sales. Dead kids are great for gun sales, and that is all the NRA cares about.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)BainsBane
(53,041 posts)I await anxiously seeing you among this year's Pulitzer winners.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)It seems I am missing a few more pearls
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)I mean what other reason is there to mention their schools other than saying "shoot up these schools?"
I don't get it.
lastone
(588 posts)and that mother fucker is crazy
Such fear, all of these gun toting maniacs are terrified of their own shadows. La Pierre is not only cowardly he is ill and requires intensive therapy in a locked down facility.
Nickels13
(5 posts)I think most Americans are smart enough to know they are clearly twisting peoples words here. Pres Obama NEVER said he is skeptical of armed guards in schools. He said he is skeptical that is the ONLY answer.
zebonaut
(3,688 posts)Why not prevent the bad guy from getting a dangerous gun in the first place?
zebonaut
(3,688 posts)Follow the poor logic and its armed guards everywhere. Gas stations; amusement parks, drive ins.....