Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton Erupts At Ron Johnson Over Benghazi (Original Post) Purveyor Jan 2013 OP
she's so good. barbtries Jan 2013 #1
She exhibits alot more patience unterrified democrat Jan 2013 #2
My thought was RoBear Jan 2013 #19
She has a 69% approval rating. He is not going to win points with the general tblue37 Jan 2013 #25
"WHAT.. DIFFERENCE.. DOES.. IT.. MAKE?" radiclib Jan 2013 #3
EXACTLY!! SkyDaddy7 Jan 2013 #24
She's not up against a heavyweight reteachinwi Jan 2013 #4
Senator stop badgering the witness. Historic NY Jan 2013 #5
She had to give Ron Paul's son a spanking as well. reverend_tim Jan 2013 #8
The disgusting part is..... Plucketeer Jan 2013 #6
Much worse DID happen under a GOP president…from 2001-2009. NYC Liberal Jan 2013 #13
yeah Plucketeer Jan 2013 #15
No I know…just agreeing with you NYC Liberal Jan 2013 #16
silly topcat007 Jan 2013 #7
Sunspot Johnson is another embarrassment to Wisconsin. Nice job by Hillary of shutting him up. Scuba Jan 2013 #9
Sec, Clinton did a good job with this asshole Gothmog Jan 2013 #10
For those who missed why Republicans jumped on Benghazi.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2013 #11
The whole damn thing (the hearing) is just to make a Democratic administration look bad. Maineman Jan 2013 #12
Republicans are desperate to find a "scandal" like they did with (Bill) Clinton, NYC Liberal Jan 2013 #14
Yes, this is what and why they jumped on Benghazi like a flea to a dog. Skarbrowe Jan 2013 #22
When was that RRRRRon John a hole asking boooosheney why they lied and thousands died???? Amonester Jan 2013 #17
Why would the evacuees necessarily know . . .? another_liberal Jan 2013 #18
I'll see your Benghazi SCVDem Jan 2013 #20
senator stupid strikes again. pansypoo53219 Jan 2013 #21
Hillary is smart, well educated, an attorney and well prepared. merrily Jan 2013 #23
2. She exhibits alot more patience
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 12:25 PM
Jan 2013

than I would have afforded him. He's trying to back her into a corner if incrimination and she's just not having it. Considering all she has been through in the past four years - he's just lint on her shoulder to be brushed off.

RoBear

(1,188 posts)
19. My thought was
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 02:34 PM
Jan 2013

more like something on her shoe to be scraped off, but your comment is dead on. I especially appreciate your pointing out the garbage she has had to go through. Surely the most impressive secretary of state in my memory--and I'm getting on up there in years. Remember Condi? Night and day!!!

tblue37

(65,457 posts)
25. She has a 69% approval rating. He is not going to win points with the general
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 07:50 PM
Jan 2013

public by trying to invent a scandal out of thin air and bullying a Secretary of State who is so obviously doing a great job! This bullying looks even worse following the disgusting RW comments about her concussion and blood clot.

Of course, it plays well with the lunatic fringe on the far right, so since that's what his purpose is, he might not care that he looks so obnoxious and stupid to more decent and rational human beings.

SkyDaddy7

(6,045 posts)
24. EXACTLY!!
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 03:58 PM
Jan 2013

I have been waiting for someone to say what has needed to be said from the start..."WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE" that it was called a protest for a couple of weeks vs a terrorist attack? These Republicans try to make everything out to be a secret Muslim plot by Obama to destroy America!

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
6. The disgusting part is.....
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 12:39 PM
Jan 2013

If this had happened under a GOP president, this asshat would be less forthright about it than ALL of the involved Obama administration has been. Johnson here - he couldn't care LESS about those who died - only whether or not their blood can be splashed onto administration members like indelible ink!

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
13. Much worse DID happen under a GOP president…from 2001-2009.
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 01:52 PM
Jan 2013

And these assholes defended it time and again.

Not that all lives lost aren't tragedies…but 4 people dead from a surprise ambush vs thousands of troops and hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians based on a pre-planned war based on lies? Which one is the GOP outraged about?

Gothmog

(145,427 posts)
10. Sec, Clinton did a good job with this asshole
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 12:51 PM
Jan 2013

Johnson is an idiot and Sec. Clinton did a good job of handling his dumb questions.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
11. For those who missed why Republicans jumped on Benghazi....
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 12:56 PM
Jan 2013

Here is their version of events.

Obama kills Osama bin Laden and struts all over Washington claiming he won the "War On Terror" then tried to pin the Benghazi attack on a protest against a film done by a right wing preacher and didn't want to call the attack "terrorism" because that would mean the "War On Terror" was still going on after all.

Don't laugh,...this is how they actually remember it.

Maineman

(854 posts)
12. The whole damn thing (the hearing) is just to make a Democratic administration look bad.
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 01:03 PM
Jan 2013

Republicans just want to divert the conversation from their many stupid comments and policy positions, and to stay on the offense.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
14. Republicans are desperate to find a "scandal" like they did with (Bill) Clinton,
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 01:56 PM
Jan 2013

and this is the best they've got.

Skarbrowe

(1,083 posts)
22. Yes, this is what and why they jumped on Benghazi like a flea to a dog.
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 02:56 PM
Jan 2013

This has been the Republican MO anytime there is a Democratic President. But, you know what? People are tuning in to watch this to see how f'n great Hillary Clinton is. I get the feeling that a very small amount of Republican citizens even care about this. I do know a rabid Limbaugh fan who is following Rand Paul's nonsensical talking points. My personal opinion is this is going to blow up in the face of these Senate and Congressional Republicans and turn into a love fest for Hillary.

The twits don't even realize they are way over on the losing side of this "supposed" scandal. I also don't remember President Obama ever stating that there were no more terrorists anywhere. Maybe I'm wrong, but like Hillary said, what difference does it make that someone came out five days later and had the wrong or incomplete info on the attack. If they had said it was terrorism within two days or three, it would still be four very good people dead. I don't know what the administration was supposed to gain by trying to address the situation by saying they still thought it was the protesters. I can wonder why they did seem to want those five talk shows to think it was the protesters. Why couldn't Susan Rice simply tell them they were still working on what happened and wanted to get it right before they told the public. Someone messed up there and I have no idea who or why they did that. It was certainly one of those times that the truth would have been the best way to go. And by truth, I mean the fact that they might have had security reasons for not telling the five talk show hosts that they were still gathering information.

I saw Susan Rice on at least two of those shows and she had obviously been told to definitely say it was perpetrated by the protesters. I guess if I was a Republican and had absolutely nothing going my way, I would try and make the biggest stink out of it as I could. That's what they are doing and Hillary is squashing them.

The House Republicans get to go after her in a few minutes. Time to check that out.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
18. Why would the evacuees necessarily know . . .?
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 02:34 PM
Jan 2013

Why would the evacuees necessarily know for sure what had led up to the attack? Their personal impressions could easily have misled the State Department even worse on that question.

 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
20. I'll see your Benghazi
Wed Jan 23, 2013, 02:36 PM
Jan 2013

and raise you an Iraq and an Afghanistan!

Now, let's talk about major fuck-ups!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Hillary Clinton Erupts At...